There can only be one outcome here

😂 Ye raging mate?

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.

Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:16:52 am

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.

Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.

Personally, I think a works phone number is far more tangible and dangerous to be posted than a name, especially when it was followed up by a threat to use the number.

That's IF you even posted the name, and it sounds like you didn't.

Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 08:21:08 am

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:16:52 am

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.

Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.

Personally, I think a works phone number is far more tangible and dangerous to be posted than a name, especially when it was followed up by a threat to use the number.

That's IF you even posted the name, and it sounds like you didn't.

Peter has the evidence Hardliner, I don’t think you will be questioning Peters honesty or integrity.

There is no squirming out of it.

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:16:52 am

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun

Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?

I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one

All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here.  You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned.  There is no outrage.

There's a high horse mentality within your group.

If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty?  Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board.  This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.

Quote from: MasterOfAssumptions on November 20, 2020, 08:24:28 am

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:16:52 am

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun

Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?

I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one

All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here.  You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned.  There is no outrage.

There's a high horse mentality within your group.

If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty?  Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board.  This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.

I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you

AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:36:42 am

Quote from: MasterOfAssumptions on November 20, 2020, 08:24:28 am

Quote from: Hardliner on November 20, 2020, 08:16:52 am

AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.

I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly.  Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.

If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.

So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun

Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?

I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one

All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here.  You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned.  There is no outrage.

There's a high horse mentality within your group.

If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty?  Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board.  This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.

I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you

AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?

I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter.  It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either.  I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.

I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed and even if the original stuff was done on another board.

Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.

Remember that MoA knows Brenty personally and won't say a word against him. For that reason his opinions mean less than nothing.