AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one 
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.