AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.
Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.
Personally, I think a works phone number is far more tangible and dangerous to be posted than a name, especially when it was followed up by a threat to use the number.
That's IF you even posted the name, and it sounds like you didn't.
Peter has the evidence Hardliner, I don’t think you will be questioning Peters honesty or integrity.
There is no squirming out of it.