270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread  (Read 1794 times)

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2020, 12:15:56 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
That’s correct. I assumed it was a bit of fun between friends.

A bit different to your behaviour. I’ll just remind you that you posted a creepy thread about where someone used to work, denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and then posted someone’s name. Then you denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and proceeded to have a meltdown.

I should not have been the one to put forward the motions and I should not have framed them in the way that I did. Those were my mistakes. The rest of what took place was democracy in action.

What are the things you shouldn’t have done?
I had a meltdown? When was this? Instead of all these long, drawn out posts can you not just apologise and we can move on?

As for posting creepy stuff about where people work, when was this? Your big, fat, baldy pal has proper previous for this. So be careful.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #31 on: December 04, 2020, 12:16:04 pm »
"AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all."

A quote that is widely regarded as being accurate

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #32 on: December 04, 2020, 12:19:00 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
We know how Coyne knows a posters name that doesn't post on here. How did you manage to find Coyne's name? That might make things a bit more interesting :)

Mrs Timbo PM'd him in a fit of rage after she got flashbacks of the debate over the Queen's duties.
The answer might well open a whole new can of worms :)

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #33 on: December 04, 2020, 12:21:51 pm »
I'm more than happy to debate ethics.

Goody.

How do you justify your support or lack of objection of AJ’s banning me from his board despite having committed no banning offence?

Like everyone else involved within these circles in the sense that I'm inconsistent in that respect and others.

We all play up to and back up our own camps whether it be with wind ups, slaggings, who we 'home in on' and how we word our posts in general.  It's what makes these sorts of environments fun IMO!

You showed inconsistency between camps during doxxgate.  Coyne got let off scot free for committing a 'crime' worse than EJ's, and you even found Coyne's crime funny at the time, whilst Noah was busy boarding up his house windows.  We are all inconsistent IMO.

I'd prefer the inconsistency to not extend to bannings and mock outrage, but I know you feel differently.  It's just something I'll have to live with I suppose.

Knowing the axe could come down at any moment isn't a nice feeling but it won't give me sleepless nights.

WTF?!?!? 😆😮

3 points.

1. It was the members who voted to let Coyne off. It wasn’t my decision.

2. Yes, we are all inconsistent. Some are more inconsistent than others however. AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all.

3. The axe is not coming down in anyone for goodness sake. It’s very unlikely anyone will ever be banned again, given nobody else ever puts forward motions and I have recused myself from doing so. 😆

1- this was in direct opposition to the blanket ban on doxxing though, which was ignored in Coyne's case.  I remember pointing out the inconsistencies before EJ's ban even took place, in EJ's case it was a question about the duration and in Brenty's case it was whether he should be banned or not, even though the automatic ban decision had been made.

2- debatable! :p

3- I'm glad to hear it.

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #34 on: December 04, 2020, 12:23:20 pm »
I'm more than happy to debate ethics.

Goody.

How do you justify your support or lack of objection of AJ’s banning me from his board despite having committed no banning offence?

Like everyone else involved within these circles in the sense that I'm inconsistent in that respect and others.

We all play up to and back up our own camps whether it be with wind ups, slaggings, who we 'home in on' and how we word our posts in general.  It's what makes these sorts of environments fun IMO!

You showed inconsistency between camps during doxxgate.  Coyne got let off scot free for committing a 'crime' worse than EJ's, and you even found Coyne's crime funny at the time, whilst Noah was busy boarding up his house windows.  We are all inconsistent IMO.

I'd prefer the inconsistency to not extend to bannings and mock outrage, but I know you feel differently.  It's just something I'll have to live with I suppose.

Knowing the axe could come down at any moment isn't a nice feeling but it won't give me sleepless nights.

WTF?!?!? 😆😮

3 points.

1. It was the members who voted to let Coyne off. It wasn’t my decision.

2. Yes, we are all inconsistent. Some are more inconsistent than others however. AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all.

3. The axe is not coming down in anyone for goodness sake. It’s very unlikely anyone will ever be banned again, given nobody else ever puts forward motions and I have recused myself from doing so. 😆

1- this was in direct opposition to the blanket ban on doxxing though, which was ignored in Coyne's case.  I remember pointing out the inconsistencies before EJ's ban even took place, in EJ's case it was a question about the duration and in Brenty's case it was whether he should be banned or not, even though the automatic ban decision had been made.

2- debatable! :p

3- I'm glad to hear it.

1. Yes, I think I might have acknowledged one or twice that I made some errors of judgment on the day.

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #35 on: December 04, 2020, 12:24:04 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
We know how Coyne knows a posters name that doesn't post on here. How did you manage to find Coyne's name? That might make things a bit more interesting :)

Mrs Timbo PM'd him in a fit of rage after she got flashbacks of the debate over the Queen's duties.
The answer might well open a whole new can of worms :)

:D

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #36 on: December 04, 2020, 12:30:01 pm »
I'm more than happy to debate ethics.

Goody.

How do you justify your support or lack of objection of AJ’s banning me from his board despite having committed no banning offence?

Like everyone else involved within these circles in the sense that I'm inconsistent in that respect and others.

We all play up to and back up our own camps whether it be with wind ups, slaggings, who we 'home in on' and how we word our posts in general.  It's what makes these sorts of environments fun IMO!

You showed inconsistency between camps during doxxgate.  Coyne got let off scot free for committing a 'crime' worse than EJ's, and you even found Coyne's crime funny at the time, whilst Noah was busy boarding up his house windows.  We are all inconsistent IMO.

I'd prefer the inconsistency to not extend to bannings and mock outrage, but I know you feel differently.  It's just something I'll have to live with I suppose.

Knowing the axe could come down at any moment isn't a nice feeling but it won't give me sleepless nights.

WTF?!?!? 😆😮

3 points.

1. It was the members who voted to let Coyne off. It wasn’t my decision.

2. Yes, we are all inconsistent. Some are more inconsistent than others however. AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all.

3. The axe is not coming down in anyone for goodness sake. It’s very unlikely anyone will ever be banned again, given nobody else ever puts forward motions and I have recused myself from doing so. 😆

1- this was in direct opposition to the blanket ban on doxxing though, which was ignored in Coyne's case.  I remember pointing out the inconsistencies before EJ's ban even took place, in EJ's case it was a question about the duration and in Brenty's case it was whether he should be banned or not, even though the automatic ban decision had been made.

2- debatable! :p

3- I'm glad to hear it.

1. Yes, I think I might have acknowledged one or twice that I made some errors of judgment on the day.

Fair play mate.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #37 on: December 04, 2020, 12:42:26 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
That’s correct. I assumed it was a bit of fun between friends.

A bit different to your behaviour. I’ll just remind you that you posted a creepy thread about where someone used to work, denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and then posted someone’s name. Then you denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and proceeded to have a meltdown.

I should not have been the one to put forward the motions and I should not have framed them in the way that I did. Those were my mistakes. The rest of what took place was democracy in action.

What are the things you shouldn’t have done?
I had a meltdown? When was this? Instead of all these long, drawn out posts can you not just apologise and we can move on?

As for posting creepy stuff about where people work, when was this? Your big, fat, baldy pal has proper previous for this. So be careful.

Here Mr Victim, why are you so angry and wrong all the time?

Big - Yes, 6ft 3in
Bald - I use hair wax every day
Fat - Nope, just under 16 stone

What a state you get yourself in over phuck all, faf to watch though.

😂😂😂
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #38 on: December 04, 2020, 12:45:17 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
That’s correct. I assumed it was a bit of fun between friends.

A bit different to your behaviour. I’ll just remind you that you posted a creepy thread about where someone used to work, denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and then posted someone’s name. Then you denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and proceeded to have a meltdown.

I should not have been the one to put forward the motions and I should not have framed them in the way that I did. Those were my mistakes. The rest of what took place was democracy in action.

What are the things you shouldn’t have done?
I had a meltdown? When was this? Instead of all these long, drawn out posts can you not just apologise and we can move on?

As for posting creepy stuff about where people work, when was this? Your big, fat, baldy pal has proper previous for this. So be careful.

Here Mr Victim, why are you so angry and wrong all the time?

Big - Yes, 6ft 3in
Bald - I use hair wax every day
Fat - Nope, just under 16 stone

What a state you get yourself in over phuck all, faf to watch though.

😂😂😂
16st? 😳 I wouldn't waste money on hair wax if I was you. It'd be like Kojak buying a set of straighteners.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #39 on: December 04, 2020, 12:48:33 pm »
I’m watching what I say, **** knows what personal info the creepy bastard has dug up on me while he’s been away.
Weird that you never said anything when it was happening to me and others elsewhere.
Bump for Cooheid. 🐄

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #40 on: December 04, 2020, 12:50:50 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
That’s correct. I assumed it was a bit of fun between friends.

A bit different to your behaviour. I’ll just remind you that you posted a creepy thread about where someone used to work, denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and then posted someone’s name. Then you denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and proceeded to have a meltdown.

I should not have been the one to put forward the motions and I should not have framed them in the way that I did. Those were my mistakes. The rest of what took place was democracy in action.

What are the things you shouldn’t have done?
I had a meltdown? When was this? Instead of all these long, drawn out posts can you not just apologise and we can move on?

As for posting creepy stuff about where people work, when was this? Your big, fat, baldy pal has proper previous for this. So be careful.

Here Mr Victim, why are you so angry and wrong all the time?

Big - Yes, 6ft 3in
Bald - I use hair wax every day
Fat - Nope, just under 16 stone

What a state you get yourself in over phuck all, faf to watch though.

😂😂😂
16st? 😳 I wouldn't waste money on hair wax if I was you. It'd be like Kojak buying a set of straighteners.



What a meltdown from you 😂😂😂

I’m away back to work now, these paper clips don’t sell themselves.
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #41 on: December 04, 2020, 12:53:42 pm »
Have fun, Brenty.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #42 on: December 04, 2020, 01:53:30 pm »
Coyne definitely isn't fat
Funny Funny x 2 View List

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #43 on: December 04, 2020, 02:00:11 pm »
Coyne definitely isn't fat
Big boned. Very, very big boned.😂

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #44 on: December 04, 2020, 02:00:34 pm »
I’m watching what I say, **** knows what personal info the creepy bastard has dug up on me while he’s been away.
Weird that you never said anything when it was happening to me and others elsewhere.
Bump for Cooheid. 🐄

Creeper.