270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread  (Read 1625 times)

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #30 on: December 04, 2020, 12:23:20 pm »
I'm more than happy to debate ethics.

Goody.

How do you justify your support or lack of objection of AJ’s banning me from his board despite having committed no banning offence?

Like everyone else involved within these circles in the sense that I'm inconsistent in that respect and others.

We all play up to and back up our own camps whether it be with wind ups, slaggings, who we 'home in on' and how we word our posts in general.  It's what makes these sorts of environments fun IMO!

You showed inconsistency between camps during doxxgate.  Coyne got let off scot free for committing a 'crime' worse than EJ's, and you even found Coyne's crime funny at the time, whilst Noah was busy boarding up his house windows.  We are all inconsistent IMO.

I'd prefer the inconsistency to not extend to bannings and mock outrage, but I know you feel differently.  It's just something I'll have to live with I suppose.

Knowing the axe could come down at any moment isn't a nice feeling but it won't give me sleepless nights.

WTF?!?!? 😆😮

3 points.

1. It was the members who voted to let Coyne off. It wasn’t my decision.

2. Yes, we are all inconsistent. Some are more inconsistent than others however. AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all.

3. The axe is not coming down in anyone for goodness sake. It’s very unlikely anyone will ever be banned again, given nobody else ever puts forward motions and I have recused myself from doing so. 😆

1- this was in direct opposition to the blanket ban on doxxing though, which was ignored in Coyne's case.  I remember pointing out the inconsistencies before EJ's ban even took place, in EJ's case it was a question about the duration and in Brenty's case it was whether he should be banned or not, even though the automatic ban decision had been made.

2- debatable! :p

3- I'm glad to hear it.

1. Yes, I think I might have acknowledged one or twice that I made some errors of judgment on the day.