270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD  (Read 20944 times)

guest19

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #165 on: December 19, 2020, 08:39:49 pm »
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #166 on: December 19, 2020, 08:43:59 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #167 on: December 19, 2020, 08:47:07 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.



I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #168 on: December 19, 2020, 08:49:48 pm »
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest19

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #169 on: December 19, 2020, 08:50:41 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.



I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.

There's been a bit of movement in that regard Cooheid.  All will be revealed tomorrow.

Nice Alan Partridge gif - I'm a fan!  My Brother in law and his wife have got me an Alan Partridge themed gift for Christmas and I'm wondering what it is.

guest16

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #170 on: December 19, 2020, 08:51:31 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.
The screenshots was an unethical act.

guest19

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #171 on: December 19, 2020, 08:52:13 pm »
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂

There are no weak minded folks within our faction.

We are all highly ethical, free-thinkers of high moral fibre.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

guest16

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #172 on: December 19, 2020, 08:55:32 pm »
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂

There are no weak minded folks within our faction.

We are all highly ethical, free-thinkers of high moral fibre.
Exactly, none of us are brainwashed by the cult 😁🇬🇧

guest19

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #173 on: December 19, 2020, 09:00:08 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #174 on: December 19, 2020, 09:08:10 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.



I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.

There's been a bit of movement in that regard Cooheid.  All will be revealed tomorrow.

Nice Alan Partridge gif - I'm a fan!  My Brother in law and his wife have got me an Alan Partridge themed gift for Christmas and I'm wondering what it is.

This was ma Valentine’s Day card to the wife last year.

Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #175 on: December 19, 2020, 09:13:49 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

guest19

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #176 on: December 19, 2020, 09:29:26 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #177 on: December 19, 2020, 09:38:19 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D

Messageboard - The Musical!
« Last Edit: December 19, 2020, 09:40:56 pm by PeterGrant »

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #178 on: December 19, 2020, 09:51:17 pm »
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D

There is no feud.

His jealousy about others that better themselves is his issue.

If he put more energy into his own personal life, than he did on here.

He might not be living in a council house, whilst poorly attempting to be a smart arse on forums.

Thems the breaks eh 👍
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest3

  • Guest
Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
« Reply #179 on: December 20, 2020, 12:56:48 am »
I live with my kids and see them every morning and every night. 😎

No access required. 🙂