270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: Yoonothy on the back foot  (Read 6876 times)

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #105 on: October 21, 2020, 01:52:03 pm »
And JTC, the SNP are polling in the high 50s for Holyrood and Westminster.

It’s likely that the SNP and Greens combined will take more than 60% of the vote at Holyrood next May.
Polls are only a indication of how people are honking at the moment in time. Also they can be skewed by askin an question a certain way or asking a certain type of person.You held pole position on the grid in 14.
That will be 60% thinking the SNP and Greens are best in Scotland (if it happens).Not the best in the UK or saying they want a Indy ref . Of course they will attach a Indy ref to their policy, they have to.I doubt that will be why X amount will be voting for them though
Think about it. In England people have voted the Tories as the main party. Do you seriously think a lot want to vote Tory?The stark fact is a decent amount would not but faced ( pre CV) with a choice of Tories or a plan off Labour which seems extreme to a lot of their natural supporters they vote Tory because what they have they want to keep and basically are not prepared to risk their house and job on a unproven set of policies in the U.K.They have probably noticed when the said policies have been tried elsewhere they have brought a disastrous result .



You also have to consider the independence polling. A majority now consistently back independence.

If an election campaign is fought with a manifesto commitment to a referendum front and centre and then there is a landslide victory, there will be a referendum.

The numbers backing independence now mirror the level of SNP and Green support.

Unionists have got to face up to reality. Or don’t, I’m fine with that.

I don't think it's fair to say that a majority now consistently back independence.  All we are going by are opinion polls, commissioned by those with a pro-Independence agenda, with loaded lead up questions and final question, small sample sizes, large numbers of undecideds by polling companies who on the run up to the referendum consistently showed results which were way more favourable to separation than the result was.

As well as this, these polls only span a period of 5 months, where Nicola Thatcher the Pint Snatcher has a huge PR advantage with her daily briefings.  Not only this, but the emotions of remainers are running high with Brexit having taken place and some loose ends still being tied.  Also, none of the issues such as the UK single market, a hard border, currency, the SNP's push for children to be able to choose their own gender, reality of Scotland even being allowed to enter the EU if it becomes a Nation.

A quick example of how these polls are riddled with spoofery is the apparent notion that support for separation has went up 5% in the space of a few days for no apparent reason.  They are not an accurate reflection of the opinion of Scots.

There's nothing to suggest they'll remain a great deal longer than the current 5 months of which we are supposed to base splitting up the Nation on.  In fact, the polls even showed support for separation going down other than the latest mad outlier which was presumably commissioned by Paul McKenna (going by the lead up questions anyway).

In short, this polling is bullsh1t.



The Times and YouGov do not have an independence agenda. The polling experts such as Professor Curtice do think it is fair to say that the view is now consistently Yes.

Polling has an excellent track record n Scotland and Unionists didn’t doubt them when they yielded results which are pleased them.

I kindly refer you to the following link, which shows that far from having an 'excellent track record', they actually consistently showed the gap between No and Yes to be far lower than the 11% it turned out to be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2014_Scottish_independence_referendum

The Times and YouGov may not have an independence agenda, but Agnes Robertson the humble crofter does.  I also do not believe Curtice has stated that these 5 month opinion polls are a true reflection of the mood of Scotland, although I'm happy to be proven wrong on this one.

The polls versus the 2014 outcome are pretty much spot on because there are no Don’t Knows in the final outcome.

Curtice has stated that these polls now reflect a consistent position for the Scottish electorate.

It has been 13 months since the union polled over 50%. Now down to 39%.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

guest17

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #106 on: October 21, 2020, 01:53:22 pm »
What an awful attempt at a put down🙈
Hmmmm. I’ve searched back and I don’t see you having any issue with Noah (83 followers) calling Buc a “thick argument plumber” over and over again. Hmmmmm. 🤔

Thick argument plumber?
Dear God.

So sorry Thickness, I was typing in the rain with a wet screen And it’s really not important enough for me to take care when I am typing on this forum.

Hope that’s understood. 😎

‘Typing in the rain with a wet screen’
Away and get a fückin life mate.

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #107 on: October 21, 2020, 02:06:34 pm »
And JTC, the SNP are polling in the high 50s for Holyrood and Westminster.

It’s likely that the SNP and Greens combined will take more than 60% of the vote at Holyrood next May.
Polls are only a indication of how people are honking at the moment in time. Also they can be skewed by askin an question a certain way or asking a certain type of person.You held pole position on the grid in 14.
That will be 60% thinking the SNP and Greens are best in Scotland (if it happens).Not the best in the UK or saying they want a Indy ref . Of course they will attach a Indy ref to their policy, they have to.I doubt that will be why X amount will be voting for them though
Think about it. In England people have voted the Tories as the main party. Do you seriously think a lot want to vote Tory?The stark fact is a decent amount would not but faced ( pre CV) with a choice of Tories or a plan off Labour which seems extreme to a lot of their natural supporters they vote Tory because what they have they want to keep and basically are not prepared to risk their house and job on a unproven set of policies in the U.K.They have probably noticed when the said policies have been tried elsewhere they have brought a disastrous result .



You also have to consider the independence polling. A majority now consistently back independence.

If an election campaign is fought with a manifesto commitment to a referendum front and centre and then there is a landslide victory, there will be a referendum.

The numbers backing independence now mirror the level of SNP and Green support.

Unionists have got to face up to reality. Or don’t, I’m fine with that.
I’m still confident that when push comes to shove the people will see the value of the Union
Of course when Nicola explains what currency  you will be using and how much it’s going to cost for a wagon or car to go through the customs border all will be well. You don’t seriously think the English / rest of the U.K. won’t do the border?Its got to happen. Wales and England have voted in Brexit for tighter immigration controls. Wee Nicola is inviting all and sundry. No British Government can allow your invited immigration into a land where the people voted not to invite so many.
You may end up being bottlenecked unless you open shipping ports.Thats before the high earners bolt to Carlise
I’m all for choices mate believe me. And if that means you leaving then so be it but I seriously doubt when all The consequences are laid bare that you will have 50.1% voting for economic suicide.
It would also help if the SNP stopped their anti English rabble rousing. The rubbish that comes out of their mouths is fuelling a anti English sentiment.If we were a different colour(as many SNP view us as white and fair game)there would be debates about racism going on . Obviously the media have been brought up in Scotland so the papers arnt picking up on this.
I hopefully will be in Scotland this coming week. I glad it’s Castle Douglas as the area isn’t rabid SNP I believe. Having experience of being in Glasgow in 14 and 15 Where I could sense a change in the air I’m glad I’m going where I’m going. In Glasgow I tried to help a drunken man in a Celtic top. I talked to him about AA. Did my level best as a recovered alcoholic. After He departed my friend who was living in Shawlands at the time told me he had said on Viewing us ‘ you pair of dirty English barstools’Im glad I didn’t hear it to be honest as I may have had a few choice words for Him!

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #108 on: October 21, 2020, 02:09:22 pm »
I don’t think the electorate in England is very well placed to lecture other countries on “economic suicide”. Or on any aspect of economic management come to that.

The unionists pushed their luck too far since 2014. It will be very much an uphill struggle to convince voters to back them again.

Agree Agree x 1 Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #109 on: October 21, 2020, 02:40:50 pm »
I don’t think the electorate in England is very well placed to lecture other countries on “economic suicide”. Or on any aspect of economic management come to that.

The unionists pushed their luck too far since 2014. It will be very much an uphill struggle to convince voters to back them again.
Pre Covid anyone who wanted a job in England could get one, maybe the rate might need raising on the minimum wage but the jobs were there. Unfortunately we have a element of our people who think work is a choice and expect the state to fund them not to work. Crackers imo.Im sure Scotland has its fair share of these. The proof about the jobs? Easy. Why are so many EEs able to get jobs but a bloke over the road from the factory can’t or won’t. No blame attached to the EEs or any immigrant by me. I blame the successive governments who have allowed people to duck out of work

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #110 on: October 21, 2020, 02:44:06 pm »
I don’t think the electorate in England is very well placed to lecture other countries on “economic suicide”. Or on any aspect of economic management come to that.

The unionists pushed their luck too far since 2014. It will be very much an uphill struggle to convince voters to back them again.
Pre Covid anyone who wanted a job in England could get one, maybe the rate might need raising on the minimum wage but the jobs were there. Unfortunately we have a element of our people who think work is a choice and expect the state to fund them not to work. Crackers imo.Im sure Scotland has its fair share of these. The proof about the jobs? Easy. Why are so many EEs able to get jobs but a bloke over the road from the factory can’t or won’t. No blame attached to the EEs or any immigrant by me. I blame the successive governments who have allowed people to duck out of work
I don’t care if a small percentage of the population ducks out of work. They won’t have the life I have and I wouldn’t swap places with them.

The cost to society in terms of cash is negligible in the grand scheme of things. Benefits are a drop in the ocean compared to the tax which is not being collected from business.

So I guess I just don’t care if a small percentage of people sit on their arses and do very little.
Dislike Dislike x 1 View List

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #111 on: October 21, 2020, 03:11:19 pm »
And JTC, the SNP are polling in the high 50s for Holyrood and Westminster.

It’s likely that the SNP and Greens combined will take more than 60% of the vote at Holyrood next May.
Polls are only a indication of how people are honking at the moment in time. Also they can be skewed by askin an question a certain way or asking a certain type of person.You held pole position on the grid in 14.
That will be 60% thinking the SNP and Greens are best in Scotland (if it happens).Not the best in the UK or saying they want a Indy ref . Of course they will attach a Indy ref to their policy, they have to.I doubt that will be why X amount will be voting for them though
Think about it. In England people have voted the Tories as the main party. Do you seriously think a lot want to vote Tory?The stark fact is a decent amount would not but faced ( pre CV) with a choice of Tories or a plan off Labour which seems extreme to a lot of their natural supporters they vote Tory because what they have they want to keep and basically are not prepared to risk their house and job on a unproven set of policies in the U.K.They have probably noticed when the said policies have been tried elsewhere they have brought a disastrous result .



You also have to consider the independence polling. A majority now consistently back independence.

If an election campaign is fought with a manifesto commitment to a referendum front and centre and then there is a landslide victory, there will be a referendum.

The numbers backing independence now mirror the level of SNP and Green support.

Unionists have got to face up to reality. Or don’t, I’m fine with that.

I don't think it's fair to say that a majority now consistently back independence.  All we are going by are opinion polls, commissioned by those with a pro-Independence agenda, with loaded lead up questions and final question, small sample sizes, large numbers of undecideds by polling companies who on the run up to the referendum consistently showed results which were way more favourable to separation than the result was.

As well as this, these polls only span a period of 5 months, where Nicola Thatcher the Pint Snatcher has a huge PR advantage with her daily briefings.  Not only this, but the emotions of remainers are running high with Brexit having taken place and some loose ends still being tied.  Also, none of the issues such as the UK single market, a hard border, currency, the SNP's push for children to be able to choose their own gender, reality of Scotland even being allowed to enter the EU if it becomes a Nation.

A quick example of how these polls are riddled with spoofery is the apparent notion that support for separation has went up 5% in the space of a few days for no apparent reason.  They are not an accurate reflection of the opinion of Scots.

There's nothing to suggest they'll remain a great deal longer than the current 5 months of which we are supposed to base splitting up the Nation on.  In fact, the polls even showed support for separation going down other than the latest mad outlier which was presumably commissioned by Paul McKenna (going by the lead up questions anyway).

In short, this polling is bullsh1t.



The Times and YouGov do not have an independence agenda. The polling experts such as Professor Curtice do think it is fair to say that the view is now consistently Yes.

Polling has an excellent track record n Scotland and Unionists didn’t doubt them when they yielded results which are pleased them.

I kindly refer you to the following link, which shows that far from having an 'excellent track record', they actually consistently showed the gap between No and Yes to be far lower than the 11% it turned out to be.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2014_Scottish_independence_referendum

The Times and YouGov may not have an independence agenda, but Agnes Robertson the humble crofter does.  I also do not believe Curtice has stated that these 5 month opinion polls are a true reflection of the mood of Scotland, although I'm happy to be proven wrong on this one.

The polls versus the 2014 outcome are pretty much spot on because there are no Don’t Knows in the final outcome.

Curtice has stated that these polls now reflect a consistent position for the Scottish electorate.

It has been 13 months since the union polled over 50%. Now down to 39%.

If they were spot on, then there must have been a huge proportion of the don't knows reverting to No.  I'd imagine this would be the same this time round.  Even with that, the pre-referendum polling was still far too favourable to Separation than it turned out to be on the day.

Do you have a link to Curtice saying this?

The Union polling over 50% is not the benchmark, Yes being higher than No is.. which has only happened for 5 months.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #112 on: October 21, 2020, 03:15:52 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #113 on: October 21, 2020, 03:24:32 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.

This would depend on the EU completely reversing their position on Scotland's entry to the EU though.

The Unionists told the truth in 2014, an independent Scotland would have meant no EU membership.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2021
  • Karma: +4/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #114 on: October 21, 2020, 03:24:52 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.

Add the English vote of 418000 when 75% voted no the last time now there's nothing like that will vote for the union they even turn up in good numbers in our marches for indy.
Maybe 50% . because of Europe.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #115 on: October 21, 2020, 03:27:52 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.

Add the English vote of 418000 when 75% voted no the last time now there's nothing like that will vote for the union they even turn up in good numbers in our marches for indy.
Maybe 50% . because of Europe.
Was it over one billion at the last indy march?
Like Like x 1 Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #116 on: October 21, 2020, 03:33:14 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.

This would depend on the EU completely reversing their position on Scotland's entry to the EU though.

The Unionists told the truth in 2014, an independent Scotland would have meant no EU membership.

That’s true, I doubt you’d get any such assurances from the eu before any referendum. Voting yes this time would be their only chance to get that back though, that wasn’t the case in 2014.

Who knows though, people are funny.

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #117 on: October 21, 2020, 03:35:38 pm »
Eu citizens are going to a huge factor if there is another one.  I worked with 40 or so at the time of the last referendum and most were going to vote no, don’t blame them given what they were told. That would be completely reversed this time around after brexit, I’m not sure how many we have in this country, think I heard circa 300,000 but that could be wrong. That’s a huge swing the other way.

Add the English vote of 418000 when 75% voted no the last time now there's nothing like that will vote for the union they even turn up in good numbers in our marches for indy.
Maybe 50% . because of Europe.
Was it over one billion at the last indy march?
Come on mate, there was more than that. The same number that was in Seville by all accounts.
Like Like x 1 Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest17

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #118 on: October 21, 2020, 03:41:22 pm »
I don’t think the electorate in England is very well placed to lecture other countries on “economic suicide”. Or on any aspect of economic management come to that.

The unionists pushed their luck too far since 2014. It will be very much an uphill struggle to convince voters to back them again.
Pre Covid anyone who wanted a job in England could get one, maybe the rate might need raising on the minimum wage but the jobs were there. Unfortunately we have a element of our people who think work is a choice and expect the state to fund them not to work. Crackers imo.Im sure Scotland has its fair share of these. The proof about the jobs? Easy. Why are so many EEs able to get jobs but a bloke over the road from the factory can’t or won’t. No blame attached to the EEs or any immigrant by me. I blame the successive governments who have allowed people to duck out of work
I don’t care if a small percentage of the population ducks out of work. They won’t have the life I have and I wouldn’t swap places with them.

The cost to society in terms of cash is negligible in the grand scheme of things. Benefits are a drop in the ocean compared to the tax which is not being collected from business.

So I guess I just don’t care if a small percentage of people sit on their arses and do very little.

You told us you were c300k in debt.
Some life.

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Yoonothy on the back foot
« Reply #119 on: October 21, 2020, 03:52:05 pm »
I don’t think the electorate in England is very well placed to lecture other countries on “economic suicide”. Or on any aspect of economic management come to that.

The unionists pushed their luck too far since 2014. It will be very much an uphill struggle to convince voters to back them again.
Pre Covid anyone who wanted a job in England could get one, maybe the rate might need raising on the minimum wage but the jobs were there. Unfortunately we have a element of our people who think work is a choice and expect the state to fund them not to work. Crackers imo.Im sure Scotland has its fair share of these. The proof about the jobs? Easy. Why are so many EEs able to get jobs but a bloke over the road from the factory can’t or won’t. No blame attached to the EEs or any immigrant by me. I blame the successive governments who have allowed people to duck out of work
I don’t care if a small percentage of the population ducks out of work. They won’t have the life I have and I wouldn’t swap places with them.

The cost to society in terms of cash is negligible in the grand scheme of things. Benefits are a drop in the ocean compared to the tax which is not being collected from business.

So I guess I just don’t care if a small percentage of people sit on their arses and do very little.
If they are Ill fine but a moral compass has been broken so I do care.
I pay my tax and want it spent on the common good, the weaker members of our society and the vulnerable. Not some work shy layabouts. Let’s face it most jobs these days you can sit on your cracker pressing a few buttons so it’s hardly hernia material is it!
Hope your Indy Scotland don’t mind picking the bill up for these folk.
Agree about multi nationals and the likes though