Racist in being Racist shock
What has he said there that is racist?
Methinks you'll be waiting a long time for an answer.
I'm used to it when the lefties scream "racist". You never get a sensible reply from them.
You did say on Faniel’s board that you think non-whites might be genetically just less virtuous than whites.😎
Did I?
Yes, you did.
Didn’t you?
I don't think that's the words I used.
When pressed, that’s what you said.
Is that not then your view?
Virtuous is not a word I use.
There’s no dodging out of this one. I used the word and asked if it was your view. And you answered.
I said blacks commit far more crime per head of population than white people. It's a fact. Sorry.
And when questioned on that you said what you said.
There’s no getting away from it.
Well if it's not genetics that makes them commit far more crimes than white people PHOP then what is it?
There we go. 😆
Well, as I explained previously. We don’t know that black people commit more crimes. We do know that if you are black you are more likely to be suspected of a crime, more likely to be prosecuted, more likely to be convicted and more likely to receive a tough sentence.
But we DO know they commit more crimes. It's an indisputable fact.
We don’t know that but even if we did (which we don’t) it would vary across regions based on a myriad of factors.
We do know that the drivers of crime are cultural and socio-economic. Where a demographic is more likely to be poor and go come from relative poverty they are more likely to commit crime.
In England, you are more likely to be poor if you are black than if you are white. In Scotland and Ireland, for example, the opposite is the case and the demographic profile of crime volume is different.
Although you'll undoubtedly find more crime in poorer areas, I think the drivers are a lot more complex than you describe.
People grow up in poorer socio-economic areas largely because of decisions their parents make, either that or the capabilities of their parents. In a meritocracy, people with higher IQs will end up with higher paid jobs and their children will have similar characteristics to them, so will go on to do similar. They'll also end up living in wealthier areas as a result.
So is it a case that their environment drives the crime? Or is it the case that those more likely to commit crime will end up in poorer areas due to the way they are and the attributes/actions of their parents? A bit of both I'd say, if you grow up amongst certain types of people then you'd be more likely to be like them, but even then you could use the argument that those people are only there because of the attributes of the individual and their parents too.
I'd be interested to see the stats with regards to the differences between and Scotland and England in terms of race and crime. Black people have probably come to the two places in different ways and for different reasons, so it'd make sense if what you say is correct. Black people have come to Scotland in much smaller numbers, and we'll have more of the 'brightest and best' because of the jobs they've come over to do. Historically, it was different in England.
So in summary:
Certain types of people are more likely to commit crime and these are also the ones who won't earn as much money in life. These poorer earnings mean they are more likely to live in poorer areas, hence the statistics.
In my opinion, of course 
So why are poor white people not committing as many crimes as poor black people from the same areas?
![EthicalScottishFitba](<a href="https://ibb.co/3c9Z0zm"><img src="https://i.ibb.co/GR4SVTQ/3-EDF45-CE-0042-434-E-ADC5-F61-F7-F5-FDD77.jpg" alt="3-EDF45-CE-0042-434-E-ADC5-F61-F7-F5-FDD77" border="0"></a><br /><a target='_blank' href='https://imgbb.com/'>upload images</a><br />)
Home
Search
Login
Register