Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Still no link though.

Never takes you long to jump in .
I know they said it .

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Where is your proof then ? 🤔
Been waiting days now

He’ll post it when he posts up how much HS2 is costing Scotland.
Don’t expect anything soon.

Quote from: LionMo on December 21, 2020, 11:41:24 am

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Where is your proof then ? 🤔
Been waiting days now

He’ll post it when he posts up how much HS2 is costing Scotland.
Don’t expect anything soon.

2% of running and maintenance costs per annum.

Quote from: TheVoiceOfReason on December 21, 2020, 11:43:42 am

Quote from: LionMo on December 21, 2020, 11:41:24 am

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Where is your proof then ? 🤔
Been waiting days now

He’ll post it when he posts up how much HS2 is costing Scotland.
Don’t expect anything soon.

Has there ever been such a clown posting about politics ? 🤔

Peters running him a very close second.
The clueless brothers.

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 11:45:03 am

Quote from: TheVoiceOfReason on December 21, 2020, 11:43:42 am

Quote from: LionMo on December 21, 2020, 11:41:24 am

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Where is your proof then ? 🤔
Been waiting days now

He’ll post it when he posts up how much HS2 is costing Scotland.
Don’t expect anything soon.

2% of running and maintenance costs per annum.

So COSTING us nothing.
Thanks.
Tell yer daft mate who thinks we’re paying 10% of the capital cost.

10% of the capital cost?  Sounds like another Nhationalist conspiracy theory.

Surprised the NHS isn't fully privatised yet, with us all paying through the nose.

Never mind, we'll be able to pay off the COVID debt nae bother with the astronomical oil revenue the white paper predicted.

Quote from: Hardliner on December 21, 2020, 11:56:20 am

Quote from: TheVoiceOfReason on December 21, 2020, 11:48:55 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 11:45:03 am

Quote from: TheVoiceOfReason on December 21, 2020, 11:43:42 am

Quote from: LionMo on December 21, 2020, 11:41:24 am

Quote from: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:35:56 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pm

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pm

Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pm

Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.

Pleasing.

Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.

The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.

Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.

Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.

Pleasing.

It is, by definition, evidence. 😀

Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.

I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.

Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.

Another feather in my cap! 

Oh they did say it .
Take that feather off your cap 

Where is your proof then ? 🤔
Been waiting days now

He’ll post it when he posts up how much HS2 is costing Scotland.
Don’t expect anything soon.

2% of running and maintenance costs per annum.

So COSTING us nothing.
Thanks.
Tell yer daft mate who thinks we’re paying 10% of the capital cost.

10% of the capital cost?  Sounds like another Nhationalist conspiracy theory.

Surprised the NHS isn't fully privatised yet, with us all paying through the nose.

Never mind, we'll be able to pay off the COVID debt nae bother with the astronomical oil revenue the white paper predicted.

Just need to start printing more £’s as that SNP halfwit MP said we could.
Another one said it’s worth more than an English £.

2 trillion in dept I think the Tories have added 800bn to that in the time they have been in power .

It's not working Scotland can and will do better ? 58% is telling us enough is enough.!!!!