Ralph is here! Welcome!!!
Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:44:08 pmQuote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pmQuote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pmNot one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.Pleasing.It is, by definition, evidence. 😀Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.Another feather in my cap! Oh they did say it .Take that feather off your cap
Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:40:23 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pmQuote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pmNot one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.Pleasing.It is, by definition, evidence. 😀Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.I'm afraid it is only evidence of one of my points, therefore causing you to fall short.Whether it's compelling or not is very relevant as to whether the character assassinations are true or not.Another feather in my cap!
Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 05:36:38 pmQuote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pmNot one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.Pleasing.It is, by definition, evidence. 😀Whether it’s considered compelling or not is another matter.
Quote from: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 05:26:22 pmQuote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pmNot one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.The BBC thing isn't evidence of both my points.Even if it was, it wouldn't be compelling evidence or even proof as you rightly say.Therefore, Mundell and Davidson are in the clear.Pleasing.
Quote from: Hardliner on December 20, 2020, 02:22:53 pmNot one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.Evidence has been provided. I grant you that proof has not.
Not one Sep has provided evidence of either Mundell/Davidson's alleged promises to resign or a condition having been met in which such a promise would be enacted.Pleasing.