270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Poll

Is Coyne’s post a banning offence?

Yes
3 (33.3%)
No
6 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 7

Author Topic: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne  (Read 2948 times)

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2020, 04:47:09 pm »
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?

No.  In my opinion, neither poster should be banned.  I'd like to just see it all forgotten about and perhaps some ethicicity shown by all parties going forward.

What's happened is that a poster is about to be banned for doing something that another poster did previously, one case being an automatic ban but one not.
No automatic ban. The board has seen to it that ethical best practice is being followed.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #16 on: November 20, 2020, 04:48:10 pm »
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?

No.  In my opinion, neither poster should be banned.  I'd like to just see it all forgotten about and perhaps some ethicicity shown by all parties going forward.

What's happened is that a poster is about to be banned for doing something that another poster did previously, one case being an automatic ban but one not.
And that's what's eating away at them. It was all fun and games when AJ was in the stocks this morning, not quite so much now that I've provided proof that Brenty used a posters real name twice. Funny how things turn out sometimes. 🙂

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2020, 04:48:17 pm »
When do the polls close Pete?

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2020, 04:51:50 pm »
When do the polls close Pete?
6 for AJ on the ban question.
9 for the question of the length of required.
12 for Coyne on the ban question.
3am for question of length.

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2020, 04:52:41 pm »
I’m withHL here. Neither posters be banned . Just a explanation of what is and isn’t allowed.Then we all know where we stand and go from there

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2020, 04:53:06 pm »
When do the polls close Pete?
6 for AJ on the ban question.
9 for the question of the length of required.
12 for Coyne on the ban question.
3am for question of length.

Aye sorry, seen it on the other thread after I posted.

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2020, 04:55:04 pm »
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?

No.  In my opinion, neither poster should be banned.  I'd like to just see it all forgotten about and perhaps some ethicicity shown by all parties going forward.

What's happened is that a poster is about to be banned for doing something that another poster did previously, one case being an automatic ban but one not.
No automatic ban. The board has seen to it that ethical best practice is being followed.

So can the result of the second amendment poll also apply to Coyne then?  That seems fair to me.

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2020, 04:55:22 pm »
 It's funny watching Pete peddle this ethical garbage when everyone knows he's been one of the bitterest bigots (on many subjects) that's ever posted.

Big words used out of context won't ever change that.

And that  ;D ;D ;D

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2020, 04:56:45 pm »
I’m withHL here. Neither posters be banned . Just a explanation of what is and isn’t allowed.Then we all know where we stand and go from there
Put forward a motion then.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2020, 04:56:51 pm »
I’m withHL here. Neither posters be banned . Just a explanation of what is and isn’t allowed.Then we all know where we stand and go from there
I suggested AJ apologised and it goes no further but he wasn't willing to do so.

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2020, 04:58:12 pm »
A good way to sort it out, IMO, would be first of all to ask the board whether an automatic ban should apply to anyone who reveals a name.

After that, an individual poll regarding the length of the ban could take place for each poster?

At the moment, the automatic ban/second amendment poll has already been compromised as it only relates to one poster.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2020, 04:58:23 pm »
I’m withHL here. Neither posters be banned . Just a explanation of what is and isn’t allowed.Then we all know where we stand and go from there
I suggested AJ apologised and it goes no further but he wasn't willing to do mso.

Nonsense, you’ve been pant pishing all day.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 285
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2020, 04:58:42 pm »
It's funny watching Pete peddle this ethical garbage when everyone knows he's been one of the bitterest bigots (on many subjects) that's ever posted.

Big words used out of context won't ever change that.

And that  ;D ;D ;D

ITB is on here?!

This is turning into an eventful day on the board

guest7

  • Guest
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #28 on: November 20, 2020, 04:59:44 pm »
I suggest certain posters who nip away like wee nyaffs, as they've always done, cut it oot.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 655
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Disciplinary measures pertaining to the poster Coyne
« Reply #29 on: November 20, 2020, 05:00:46 pm »
Good to see you back mr theboy hope all is well.