270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread  (Read 1782 times)

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #15 on: December 04, 2020, 11:47:19 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #16 on: December 04, 2020, 11:49:32 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #17 on: December 04, 2020, 11:51:18 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #18 on: December 04, 2020, 11:53:54 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
 

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #19 on: December 04, 2020, 11:55:30 am »
This was very predictable

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #20 on: December 04, 2020, 11:56:37 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #21 on: December 04, 2020, 11:56:43 am »
This was very predictable
I'll just post what you want to read. That'll be easier.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #22 on: December 04, 2020, 11:57:38 am »
The creeper hasn’t changed it seems.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #23 on: December 04, 2020, 11:58:33 am »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #24 on: December 04, 2020, 11:59:37 am »
This was very predictable
I'll just post what you want to read. That'll be easier.
That would be great thanks

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #25 on: December 04, 2020, 12:03:13 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
We know how Coyne knows a posters name that doesn't post on here. How did you manage to find Coyne's name? That might make things a bit more interesting :)

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 655
  • Karma: +0/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #26 on: December 04, 2020, 12:05:16 pm »
Great to see everyone getting along.

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #27 on: December 04, 2020, 12:06:18 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
That’s correct. I assumed it was a bit of fun between friends.

A bit different to your behaviour. I’ll just remind you that you posted a creepy thread about where someone used to work, denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and then posted someone’s name. Then you denied it, admitted it, denied it, admitted it and proceeded to have a meltdown.

I should not have been the one to put forward the motions and I should not have framed them in the way that I did. Those were my mistakes. The rest of what took place was democracy in action.

What are the things you shouldn’t have done?
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #28 on: December 04, 2020, 12:12:02 pm »
I'm more than happy to debate ethics.

Goody.

How do you justify your support or lack of objection of AJ’s banning me from his board despite having committed no banning offence?

Like everyone else involved within these circles in the sense that I'm inconsistent in that respect and others.

We all play up to and back up our own camps whether it be with wind ups, slaggings, who we 'home in on' and how we word our posts in general.  It's what makes these sorts of environments fun IMO!

You showed inconsistency between camps during doxxgate.  Coyne got let off scot free for committing a 'crime' worse than EJ's, and you even found Coyne's crime funny at the time, whilst Noah was busy boarding up his house windows.  We are all inconsistent IMO.

I'd prefer the inconsistency to not extend to bannings and mock outrage, but I know you feel differently.  It's just something I'll have to live with I suppose.

Knowing the axe could come down at any moment isn't a nice feeling but it won't give me sleepless nights.

WTF?!?!? 😆😮

3 points.

1. It was the members who voted to let Coyne off. It wasn’t my decision.

2. Yes, we are all inconsistent. Some are more inconsistent than others however. AJ is more inconsistent than me for example, yet demands absolute consistency from all.

3. The axe is not coming down in anyone for goodness sake. It’s very unlikely anyone will ever be banned again, given nobody else ever puts forward motions and I have recused myself from doing so. 😆
Agree Agree x 1 View List

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Messagebord Ethics Debate Thread
« Reply #29 on: December 04, 2020, 12:15:18 pm »
Ready when you are, AJ.
Ready for what? You're a coward. That's it really.

Let’s talk about that.

Who was it who went into hiding and banned from from your board so I couldn’t even communicate with you to try to resolve matters? Who was it who had a massive **** fest behind people’s backs?

Was that me, or was it you?
You're a coward. That's all there is to say.
I’m not a coward AJ. I don’t run and hide from scrutiny. You look like a coward yourself if you won’t answer the basic questions I’ve put to you.

I also have another question.

Who is it who has admitted having made errors of judgment regarding the whole incident. Is it me or is it you?
Just admit you totally phucked up, showed tremendous cowardice, apologise and we can move on.
I did phuck up, but I don't agree with your other point.

Can you find it within you to admit at this point that it was wrong to post a user's name on the board?
Address Brenty posting Noah's real name TWICE and I'll answer that.

And from now on your name is "The Coward".
OK. It was wrong to post Noah's real name too. Had the vote been for a ban, there would have been one and I'm sure Coyne would have taken it on the chin.

VoiceofReason though has never complained about those posts, and I certainly believed at the time that there was friendly banter between him and Coyne regarding the matter.

I've addressed it. Now answer.
Nope, you're dodging it as usual. He posted a real name TWICE and you did absolutely nothing about it. Well, that's not strictly true. You 'liked' one of the posts and laughed at the other. How very ethical of you.
We know how Coyne knows a posters name that doesn't post on here. How did you manage to find Coyne's name? That might make things a bit more interesting :)

Mrs Timbo PM'd him in a fit of rage after she got flashbacks of the debate over the Queen's duties.