Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.
Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.
Pretty simple
Thankyou for the kind advice Coyne. If I'm needing help on my posting style then I'll be sure to come to you.
I've been considering your 'phukin magic' and 'OMHS' catchphrases followed by 10 emojis for quite some time, but I don't think I could do them justice at this stage.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
It’s a moral issue I’m afraid.
Simply confirm that I did not, as you claimed, say that I could see posts and I will answer your questions.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Has he made the announcement yet? It’s just been word salad so far.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see
I'm absolutely fine, mate. How are you keeping?
Many thanks for the suggestion.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see
I'm absolutely fine, mate. How are you keeping?
Many thanks for the suggestion.
I'm good mate thanks
Hope to see you back on here posting and debating again soon
This board is open for anyone to post and join and anyone who doesn't it's their own choice. Anything else is a bit ridiculous really
Has he made the announcement yet? It’s just been word salad so far.
Mr panty's announcements seem to get a big build up then sadly end up being a bit of a damp squib.
Good morning Pete.
Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.
Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.
You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.
To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same. Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.
Thanks for expressing an interest!
Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯
I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.
I can't predict what the panel will say mate. You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first. I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.
I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.
Did I say I could view posts?
You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.
Are you able to view the assessment? If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.
I'm happy to leave it at that though. You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.
If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?
What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see
I'm absolutely fine, mate. How are you keeping?
Many thanks for the suggestion.
I'm good mate thanks
Hope to see you back on here posting and debating again soon
This board is open for anyone to post and join and anyone who doesn't it's their own choice. Anything else is a bit ridiculous really
I'd love to be back posting proper.
Sometimes I try to type a new topic, but my fingers automatically recoil and I get flashbacks of what has happened and thoughts of how there has been no apology.
It's like I have extreme high moral fibre contained within every blood cell.
It's all in Pete's hands.
Hardliner is liked and respected by all here, and it is sad to see him in AJ’s clutches.
My admission of process errors on Friday 21st that were unfair to AJ and his subsequent early unbanning should be enough for everyone.
I have no issue with displaying humility but I won’t be bullied, by AJ nor by anyone, especially when AJ is running scared of open debate and is manipulating people.
Mr panty seems incredibly keen to impress his chums on the other board for a pat on the head as it were. I'm sure he's a decent chap in real life but his recent posts have been pretty cringey to say the least. Hopefully in the new year we'll see some improvement.
Agree x 2
View List