Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:20:57 am

Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:30:27 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:20:57 am

Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.

Quote from: The_Spineless_Shitebag_Timsley on December 02, 2020, 10:46:49 am

This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people 

Yes, one who won’t even fight his own corner with a free and open platform to do so.

Sad to see how the other 3 have been manipulated and used by him. His victim rhetoric can be compelling at first though, until you’ve seen it play out several times so I really don’t blame them.

And the demand for ethics from others who’s standards he will never reach and has no intention of reaching. It is remarkable and fascinating to observe.

I would note at this point I am banned from his board for nothing at all that I have posted on his board, while he lectures others! 🥴🥴🥴

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:57:46 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:53:16 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:48:01 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:30:27 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:20:57 am

Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.

I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:52:08 am

Quote from: The_Spineless_Shitebag_Timsley on December 02, 2020, 10:46:49 am

This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people 

Yes, one who won’t even fight his own corner with a free and open platform to do so.

Sad to see how the other 3 have been manipulated and used by him. His victim rhetoric can be compelling at first though, until you’ve seen it play out several times so I really don’t blame them.

And the demand for ethics from others who’s standards he will never reach and has no intention of reaching. It is remarkable and fascinating to observe.

I would note at this point I am banned from his board for nothing at all that I have posted on his board, while he lectures others! 🥴🥴🥴

You should demand an apology for him banning you 

In all honesty I hope you won't even be considering any form of apology. He will miss a busy board the most out of anyone and it his choice he isn't posting on here.

I plan on reminding him often about his hilarious behaviour the last couple weeks if I ever share a board with him again 

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 11:15:13 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 11:12:52 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:57:46 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:53:16 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:48:01 am

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:30:27 am

Quote from: Hardliner on December 02, 2020, 10:20:57 am

Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.

I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?