Can we agree it should be on creepy behaviour? Anything incidents hinting at doxing, employers, etc to be commonly understood as beyond the pale?

And should we elect our admins and be able to remove them with votes of no confidence?

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 24, 2020, 11:46:51 am

Can we agree it should be on creepy behaviour? Anything incidents hinting at doxing, employers, etc to be commonly understood as beyond the pale?

And should we elect our admins and be able to remove them with votes of no confidence?

Agree with that. I would suggest yourself and hardliner were the 2 admins going forward

2nd that.

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 24, 2020, 11:46:51 am

Can we agree it should be on creepy behaviour? Anything incidents hinting at doxing, employers, etc to be commonly understood as beyond the pale?

And should we elect our admins and be able to remove them with votes of no confidence?

Agree with that. I would suggest yourself and hardliner were the 2 admins going forward

Good shout. I actually wanted to do that from day 1 but held off as I thought it might look like cronyism. But I think they trust him now so it could bring balance to the force and peace to the galaxy. But not too much peace.

Let’s all keep developing the model.

Can we agree it should be on creepy behaviour? Anything incidents hinting at doxing, employers, etc to be commonly understood as beyond the pale?

And should we elect our admins and be able to remove them with votes of no confidence?

Agree on the first part.

However as for admin I'd say it should be you and you alone. All this motions and polls stuff is nonsense and has to go. You can say what you want about me, and indeed you have over the years, but I'd put my faith in you to moderate now we are clearer on what's acceptable. I appreciate you can't be on 24/7 but retrospective action is fine. My previous points regarding the poisonous Dundee Ghost still stand. Thank you.

Quote from: PeterGrant on December 24, 2020, 11:46:51 am

Can we agree it should be on creepy behaviour? Anything incidents hinting at doxing, employers, etc to be commonly understood as beyond the pale?

And should we elect our admins and be able to remove them with votes of no confidence?

Agree on the first part.

However as for admin I'd say it should be you and you alone. All this motions and polls stuff is nonsense and has to go. You can say what you want about me, and indeed you have over the years, but I'd put my faith in you to moderate now we are clearer on what's acceptable. I appreciate you can't be on 24/7 but retrospective action is fine. My previous points regarding the poisonous Dundee Ghost still stand. Thank you.

The Dundee Ghost 😂😂😂

Mind that, when you were on ignore? 😂😂

Aye, it was a right hoot eh 😂😂😂

Mr pantyliner would be a poor choice as admin imo mr grant. He's too easily influenced by mr angry and seems a bit scared to do anything that might upset him. Just my two bob's worth.

Mr pantyliner would be a poor choice as admin imo mr grant. He's too easily influenced by mr angry and seems a bit scared to do anything that might upset him. Just my two bob's worth.

Do you think it should be a robust character, like Femmesley for example, Mrs Timbo?