270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Poll

Length of suspension

3 days
2 (25%)
1 week
2 (25%)
1 month
4 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Author Topic: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ  (Read 14913 times)

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #90 on: November 20, 2020, 10:50:57 am »
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #91 on: November 20, 2020, 10:52:46 am »
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...
And folk mocking him about a relationship breakup and going on about how they think he is not seeing his kid. 2 wrongs don't make a right i'm sure you agree

I'd rather it was all cut out and we just powered each other about football and the odd political debate
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #92 on: November 20, 2020, 10:53:29 am »
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.
He should have just apologised like I suggested and maybe it wouldn't have got to this

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #93 on: November 20, 2020, 10:56:26 am »
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.
He should have just apologised like I suggested and maybe it wouldn't have got to this
And coyne, should he apologise?

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #94 on: November 20, 2020, 10:56:58 am »
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #95 on: November 20, 2020, 10:57:05 am »
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.

There is factual evidence Mo, what part of that are you struggling with?
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #96 on: November 20, 2020, 10:58:47 am »
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...
And folk mocking him about a relationship breakup and going on about how they think he is not seeing his kid. 2 wrongs don't make a right i'm sure you agree

I'd rather it was all cut out and we just powered each other about football and the odd political debate

Correct, JTC must have missed those posts 🤷‍♂️
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #97 on: November 20, 2020, 10:59:48 am »
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?

Do you personally find the Jack Nicholson gif offensive?
I post, the dafties always dive right in!
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #98 on: November 20, 2020, 11:00:05 am »
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?
I thought you were joking about the Jack Nicholson Gif. It is off a movie and it isn't real. It came from the old board where Ralph used it

Bit sensitive mate?

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #99 on: November 20, 2020, 11:01:05 am »
MoA, correct though I will bet in most cases it’s a reply to coynes idea of the ‘craic’
Personally I won’t be voting unless a No Ban option is allowed.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #100 on: November 20, 2020, 11:05:32 am »
MoA, correct though I will bet in most cases it’s a reply to coynes idea of the ‘craic’
Personally I won’t be voting unless a No Ban option is allowed.
If you are worried about women being offended then Hardliner's post about which women would you want a 3some with might be up there. For the record I see nothing the matter with either that post or the GIF

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #101 on: November 20, 2020, 11:07:47 am »
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
Funny Funny x 2 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #102 on: November 20, 2020, 11:14:13 am »
Clutching at straws
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #103 on: November 20, 2020, 11:16:04 am »
AgainMoA if you look I cast no comment on the thread.
I’m not against pretty women posing like on page 3.
It’s their choice. I’m in favour of choice and women of beauty are a nice choice to look at
Blokes posting pictures of other blokes chugging probably should be on grinder mate
Let’s just say if he kept sending that txt to the group of lads I’m mates with he’d be blanked after a couple of occasions of it happening or in some cases grabbed around the throat and told to take himself and his sexual perversion elsewhere
You may be ok with it but I think i stinks and is usually a insult to someone anyway

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #104 on: November 20, 2020, 11:20:54 am »
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.

There is factual evidence Mo, what part of that are you struggling with?
I have not seen any evidence.

And why do you post about my wife ?
Do you really think that is aaceptable ?