270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Poll

Length of suspension

3 days
2 (25%)
1 week
2 (25%)
1 month
4 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Author Topic: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ  (Read 14907 times)

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #15 on: November 20, 2020, 09:46:17 am »
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #16 on: November 20, 2020, 09:47:53 am »
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.
Why do you call him cooheid btw?

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #17 on: November 20, 2020, 09:48:21 am »
The fact he’s trying to act like his posts over the last 3 days or so are merely a coincidence is the stuff of 5yr olds.

I’d swear the **** was an only child growing up. 😂

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #18 on: November 20, 2020, 09:48:33 am »
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #19 on: November 20, 2020, 09:49:56 am »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #20 on: November 20, 2020, 09:50:43 am »
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.
Exactly. The vote is a farce and Pete knows it. Still, it won't change certain things. 😎

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #21 on: November 20, 2020, 09:50:51 am »
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #22 on: November 20, 2020, 09:51:02 am »
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.

guest20

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #23 on: November 20, 2020, 09:51:11 am »
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Like Like x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #24 on: November 20, 2020, 09:51:21 am »
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.

AJ overstepped the mark badly, let’s move on.
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #25 on: November 20, 2020, 09:51:59 am »
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.

Agreed 100%

The mock outrage from him is beyond belief.

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #26 on: November 20, 2020, 09:52:11 am »
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #27 on: November 20, 2020, 09:52:46 am »
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Aaawwww,Cooheid's found his voice. 🐄 😂

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #28 on: November 20, 2020, 09:53:21 am »
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Listen to you snow fuc#king white.
Fu#king ars#hole
Like Like x 1 Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #29 on: November 20, 2020, 09:53:37 am »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?