270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Poll

Length of suspension

3 days
2 (25%)
1 week
2 (25%)
1 month
4 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 8

Author Topic: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ  (Read 14863 times)

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #135 on: November 20, 2020, 12:32:26 pm »
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍

I’m sure he’s already said he is boycotting min.

I’ve just put some fizz in the fridge alongside my beers.

I must’ve missed that, happy days, I might have a beer tonight to celebrate.
You miss a lot of things, when it suits. Shitebag.

Woe is me 🎻

guest17

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #136 on: November 20, 2020, 01:09:11 pm »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #137 on: November 20, 2020, 01:13:15 pm »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
But it was banter and funny when it was our names getting splashed over the board. Tune in.😡

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #138 on: November 20, 2020, 01:24:28 pm »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #139 on: November 20, 2020, 01:28:28 pm »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
But it was banter and funny when it was our names getting splashed over the board. Tune in.😡
Our names? You posted other peoples names on Danny's board as well FFS. You forget that? You also allowed it on your own board as well.

This is Peter's board and he chooses to put it to a vote. You might not even get banned

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #140 on: November 20, 2020, 01:29:17 pm »
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #141 on: November 20, 2020, 01:32:13 pm »
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #142 on: November 20, 2020, 01:34:37 pm »
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #143 on: November 20, 2020, 01:34:50 pm »
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #144 on: November 20, 2020, 01:36:06 pm »
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.

guest17

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #145 on: November 20, 2020, 01:37:25 pm »
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #146 on: November 20, 2020, 01:37:57 pm »
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.
That's not true and its easily proven


Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #147 on: November 20, 2020, 01:40:11 pm »
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.

Imagine getting in this state about a potential ban.

😂😂😂
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #148 on: November 20, 2020, 01:43:10 pm »
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.
That's not true and its easily proven
He put the programme up ya headcase with his full name on it. Stop lying ffs.

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« Reply #149 on: November 20, 2020, 01:43:46 pm »
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.

Imagine getting in this state about a potential ban.

😂😂😂
You've fvcked up, Brenty, and you know it. 😎