270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Poll

Length of suspension

3 days
2 (25%)
1 week
2 (25%)
1 month
4 (50%)

Total Members Voted: 8

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14   Go Down

Author Topic: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ  (Read 14810 times)

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
« on: November 20, 2020, 09:17:23 am »
On the 19th of November 2020, Brother AJ did knowingly, wilfully and with malice aforethought post personal details of a fellow board user, specifically his name, in order to seek to engender fear, alarm or general rattlement.

This is a transgression in terms of the community’s ethicicity.

A Community Sanction is hereby proposed.

Poll attached to this thread.
« Last Edit: November 20, 2020, 10:45:04 am by PeterGrant »
Logged

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook

Funny Funny x 1 View List

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #1 on: November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am »
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
Logged

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #2 on: November 20, 2020, 09:23:09 am »
I did say he could apologise and we move on but he has refused to do so :(
Logged

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #3 on: November 20, 2020, 09:25:11 am »
I don’t think AJ should be getting to vote on this.
Logged
I post, the dafties always dive right in!

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #4 on: November 20, 2020, 09:27:20 am »
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Logged

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #5 on: November 20, 2020, 09:29:11 am »
Quote from: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:27:20 am
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
Logged

Offline

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3208
  • Karma: +0/-2
  • Not in charge
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #6 on: November 20, 2020, 09:30:45 am »
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:29:11 am
Quote from: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:27:20 am
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
You posted his surname.
Logged

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #7 on: November 20, 2020, 09:35:11 am »
Quote from: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:30:45 am
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:29:11 am
Quote from: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:27:20 am
Quote from: Alarming Janitor on November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
You posted his surname.
Did I?  ???
Logged

guest16

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #8 on: November 20, 2020, 09:38:16 am »
So there is not a no ban option. Not very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
Logged
Like Like x 1 View List

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2020, 09:38:50 am »
Quote from: LionMo on November 20, 2020, 09:38:16 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
10/10. 👍
Logged

guest19

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #10 on: November 20, 2020, 09:42:29 am »
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1092
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #11 on: November 20, 2020, 09:44:35 am »
Where’s the forever option?
Logged
Funny Funny x 1 View List

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 997
  • Karma: +0/-2
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #12 on: November 20, 2020, 09:44:40 am »
Quote from: LionMo on November 20, 2020, 09:38:16 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Logged

guest3

  • Guest
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #13 on: November 20, 2020, 09:45:31 am »
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Logged

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2653
  • Karma: +3/-0
    • View Profile
Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
« Reply #14 on: November 20, 2020, 09:45:41 am »
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Logged
I post, the dafties always dive right in!
Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 14   Go Up
« previous next »