It has been reported that the poster Coyne posted the name of another board user.
The motivations for this are a matter of debate.
For referring to the poster VoiceofReason as “paddy” what is the board’s doom upon Coyne?
Is the a banning offence or not?
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Length of ban will be in a different poll. Learning as I go.
It’s differently worded because it was me who did the motion and those were the words in my head at the time. I didn’t go back and check and copy yours.
You could have raised your own motion but didn’t seem to want to for some reason.
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Length of ban will be in a different poll. Learning as I go.
It’s differently worded because it was me who did the motion and those were the words in my head at the time. I didn’t go back and check and copy yours.
You could have raised your own motion but didn’t seem to want to for some reason.
I left it in your ethical hands but it appears I was wrong to do so.
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Length of ban will be in a different poll. Learning as I go.
It’s differently worded because it was me who did the motion and those were the words in my head at the time. I didn’t go back and check and copy yours.
You could have raised your own motion but didn’t seem to want to for some reason.
I left it in your ethical hands but it appears I was wrong to do so.
I always strive but I can’t always succeed in everyone’s eyes. Which is why it’s good to have the checks and balances of democratic process.
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Length of ban will be in a different poll. Learning as I go.
It’s differently worded because it was me who did the motion and those were the words in my head at the time. I didn’t go back and check and copy yours.
You could have raised your own motion but didn’t seem to want to for some reason.
I left it in your ethical hands but it appears I was wrong to do so.
I always strive but I can’t always succeed in everyone’s eyes. Which is why it’s good to have the checks and balances of democratic process.
No, you've shown blatant favouritism and bias. But at least I know the rules going forward.
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
Of course it should. I don't know who Pete is trying to kid here.
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?
Did he say that?
Can you not read my username Angry Janny
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
The ban on duration for AJ is rendered moot should the poll regarding him being banned at all go in his favour.
If Coyne gets a ban vote we will of course vote on the duration.
Why is this worded differently to mine and why is there no option to pick a length of ban?
Length of ban will be in a different poll. Learning as I go.
It’s differently worded because it was me who did the motion and those were the words in my head at the time. I didn’t go back and check and copy yours.
You could have raised your own motion but didn’t seem to want to for some reason.
I left it in your ethical hands but it appears I was wrong to do so.
I always strive but I can’t always succeed in everyone’s eyes. Which is why it’s good to have the checks and balances of democratic process.
No, you've shown blatant favouritism and bias. But at least I know the rules going forward.
I don’t feel any favouritism or bias, but I do have an objective opinion on what has transpired.
I was thinking that in the interests of consistency, the poll would be how long Coyne should be banned for, rather than whether there should be a ban or not.
So you think AJ should be banned?
No. In my opinion, neither poster should be banned. I'd like to just see it all forgotten about and perhaps some ethicicity shown by all parties going forward.
What's happened is that a poster is about to be banned for doing something that another poster did previously, one case being an automatic ban but one not.
Agree x 1
Disagree x 1
Like x 1
View List