EthicalScottishFitba

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:17:23 am


Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 21, 2020, 08:17:35 am
The thing about these britnat types is they don't know how to accept the result of a democratic vote
They also get very confused I think, but yes, they don’t like democracy much unless they win.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on November 21, 2020, 08:15:44 am
The thing about these britnat types is they don't know how to accept the result of a democratic vote
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 21, 2020, 07:14:45 am
I hope they told mr deemo about the boycott or he's not going to be happy when he logs in tomorrow!
The boycott was supposed to be if there was no vote on Coyne, but we know righties aren’t really ones for democracy or keeping their word so who knows. 😆
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:48:12 pm
I hope they told mr deemo about the boycott or he's not going to be happy when he logs in tomorrow!

Won’t see any difference then 😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:43:26 pm
I hope they told mr deemo about the boycott or he's not going to be happy when he logs in tomorrow!
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:35:20 pm
Very nearly 800 posts of this today. 800.

I think 600 of them were from mr aj.

It’s incredible someone nearly 50 acted like that, he has serious issues.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:21:44 pm
Very nearly 800 posts of this today. 800.

I think 600 of them were from mr aj.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:17:59 pm
Looking forward to a relaxing weekend

And a relaxed, thriving board in the absence of pollution.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 10:14:11 pm
Very nearly 800 posts of this today. 800.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:11:07 pm
Looking forward to a relaxing weekend
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:10:04 pm
That was some meltdown today. Never seen anything like that even on mr danny's board.

It was some spectacle, Mr Rambo, all of it completely unnecessary too.

Could’ve been fixed in a much more dignified manner.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on November 20, 2020, 10:09:31 pm
That was some meltdown today. Never seen anything like that even on mr danny's board.

Best to make sure the numbers are on your side before coming out with stuff like this Mr Rambo
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:05:43 pm
That was some meltdown today. Never seen anything like that even on mr danny's board.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on November 20, 2020, 10:03:06 pm
Our guest numbers are through the roof tonight.

You thick **** nae understand what a boycott means?

It's a bit like when the Rangers fans boycotted away games
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:02:48 pm
(https://i.postimg.cc/Cxk4kRRN/922878-B2-D727-4553-ADA8-ADCD7-EE50-BDA.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:57:39 pm
Our guest numbers are through the roof tonight.

You thick **** nae understand what a boycott means?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 09:53:43 pm
If he apologises and calls me Sir Coyne, I’d vote to reduce it to 3 weeks and 6 days.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 09:53:15 pm
All away in a big huff?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on November 20, 2020, 09:51:39 pm
Voting unlocked till 9pm.

What happens now mr grant?
He’s off for a month, as it stands. That was the outcome of the voting.

I hope for clemency though and early parole. As ever that is in the hands of the people.

Democracy in action
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:46:13 pm
Voting unlocked till 9pm.

What happens now mr grant?
He’s off for a month, as it stands. That was the outcome of the voting.

I hope for clemency though and early parole. As ever that is in the hands of the people.

I doubt that, his pals are boycotting now I think.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:43:19 pm
Voting unlocked till 9pm.

What happens now mr grant?
He’s off for a month, as it stands. That was the outcome of the voting.

I hope for clemency though and early parole. As ever that is in the hands of the people.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 09:17:34 pm
Voting unlocked till 9pm.

What happens now mr grant?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 06:52:09 pm
Voting unlocked till 9pm.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on November 20, 2020, 03:13:23 pm
Is there people on here with duel accounts?
Yes I also post as VOR

VOR is ruining football
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 02:43:23 pm
Is there people on here with duel accounts?
Yes I also post as VOR
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 02:42:35 pm
Is there people on here with duel accounts?
Pete will be busy making up new accounts just now to get his ban voted through. 😂

Joe Biden aint got a look in.😃
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 02:40:34 pm
Is there people on here with duel accounts?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 02:31:38 pm
Pogue put his real name up in the fantasy football league.😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 02:31:28 pm
Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
I enjoy PMs about peoples names do I?

I have never mentioned anyones name and never posted your name on the boards. You have done it to me many a time and you also done it on AJs board

You can't point your finger at me for posting peoples private info i'm afraid

Are you Femmesley I take it?  I didn't even know that  ;D
I don't know what you mean  ;D

 ;D

I don't know your real name? If I used something it must've been a fluke and really memorable because I've no recollection of it  :D

I do remember the wankfest when mine was getting bandied about though. The only retaliation I ever did was hinting to dear Pogue I might spill his. I knew it through golf. I never did use it though. Good guy me, you see
You did, and i'm only bringing it up in response to your earlier post. I'm not even fussed now but just stating I have never done it myself
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest7 on November 20, 2020, 02:30:05 pm
Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
I enjoy PMs about peoples names do I?

I have never mentioned anyones name and never posted your name on the boards. You have done it to me many a time and you also done it on AJs board

You can't point your finger at me for posting peoples private info i'm afraid

Are you Femmesley I take it?  I didn't even know that  ;D
I don't know what you mean  ;D

 ;D

I don't know your real name? If I used something it must've been a fluke and really memorable because I've no recollection of it  :D

I do remember the wankfest when mine was getting bandied about though. The only retaliation I ever did was hinting to dear Pogue I might spill his. I knew it through golf. I never did use it though. Good guy me, you see
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 02:29:32 pm
And I'd like the same options for Brenty's ban please. Just to be ethical.🙂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 02:27:34 pm
The WhatsApp messages are getting fired far and wide on this ethical Friday.

(https://i.postimg.cc/bY2xVstJ/0861-D159-606-C-4621-9868-F4-CAB775116-A.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Turns out Brenty used a real name pal. This has all got VERY awkward. ☹
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 02:27:11 pm
Looks like back up has arrived. This is all very exciting. I wonder if mr gallus will make an appearance as well!!!
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 02:26:18 pm
Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
I enjoy PMs about peoples names do I?

I have never mentioned anyones name and never posted your name on the boards. You have done it to me many a time and you also done it on AJs board

You can't point your finger at me for posting peoples private info i'm afraid

Are you Femmesley I take it?  I didn't even know that  ;D
I don't know what you mean  ;D
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest7 on November 20, 2020, 02:24:50 pm
Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
I enjoy PMs about peoples names do I?

I have never mentioned anyones name and never posted your name on the boards. You have done it to me many a time and you also done it on AJs board

You can't point your finger at me for posting peoples private info i'm afraid

Are you Femmesley I take it?  I didn't even know that  ;D
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 02:21:42 pm
Cousin ITB, how the hell are you? Do you remember when it was banter and a great laugh to have our real names put up? 😂
From my point of view he was one of the worst for it
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 02:21:06 pm
Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
I enjoy PMs about peoples names do I?

I have never mentioned anyones name and never posted your name on the boards. You have done it to me many a time and you also done it on AJs board

You can't point your finger at me for posting peoples private info i'm afraid
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest7 on November 20, 2020, 02:20:52 pm
Cousin ITB, how the hell are you? Do you remember when it was banter and a great laugh to have our real names put up? 😂

Course I do Cousin, a great laugh for them all. The admin Femmesley sorted it out though....er, perhaps not. I see he's still a wet wipe   ;D
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 02:18:45 pm
The WhatsApp messages are getting fired far and wide on this ethical Friday.

(https://i.postimg.cc/bY2xVstJ/0861-D159-606-C-4621-9868-F4-CAB775116-A.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 02:18:20 pm
Cousin ITB, how the hell are you? Do you remember when it was banter and a great laugh to have our real names put up? 😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest7 on November 20, 2020, 02:16:07 pm
 Brenty, Femmesley and the snats are still as sleekit as ever I see.

They love a bit of PMing about real names, always have done as they get the utter pish ripped oot them and have to retort somehow.

Misty started it all, the treacle pudding sharing ****  ;D
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Jake Roberts on November 20, 2020, 02:09:50 pm
Oh my word!  ;D
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:58:22 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.
Listen pal I don't really want to know who you are. I just joined in the whole Noah thing as it did seem like you were similar at the start. You were giving Buc a hard time so I just went with it. You seemed to have eased off with him so don't bother with it anymore

As I said previously Coyne and Noah travel to games together so that would be quite something and a little awkward in the Clep bar first game back eh :)

You know my opinions on the private info stuff as I've had it done to me so I agree with you and I took your point on yesterday about giving out too much info
You really are a spineless cvnt.😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 01:56:58 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.
I have never, ever in my life, tried to find out the real identity of anyone who has ever posted on any messageboard.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 01:52:41 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.
Listen pal I don't really want to know who you are. I just joined in the whole Noah thing as it did seem like you were similar at the start. You were giving Buc a hard time so I just went with it. You seemed to have eased off with him so don't bother with it anymore

As I said previously Coyne and Noah travel to games together so that would be quite something and a little awkward in the Clep bar first game back eh :)

You know my opinions on the private info stuff as I've had it done to me so I agree with you and I took your point on yesterday about giving out too much info
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Buc on November 20, 2020, 01:47:32 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.


Take that to the bank great song


https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=VgKDCxzWo3k

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:43:46 pm
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.

Imagine getting in this state about a potential ban.

😂😂😂
You've fvcked up, Brenty, and you know it. 😎
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:43:10 pm
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.
That's not true and its easily proven
He put the programme up ya headcase with his full name on it. Stop lying ffs.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 01:40:11 pm
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.

Imagine getting in this state about a potential ban.

😂😂😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 01:37:57 pm
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.
That's not true and its easily proven

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest17 on November 20, 2020, 01:37:25 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind

It’s none of your concern, or anyone else for that matter, who I am.
I don’t share personal information about myself on any anonymous message board.
Anyone who thinks they know me, don’t...and you can take that to the fûckin bank.
Post up any name you want. I really couldn’t give a fück....because you’ll be wrong.
Peter, and others, have been scrambling about trying to find out who I am. No idea why.
Peter has been looking where I’ve pointed him from day 1. If he didn’t know it before he’ll know it now, and I know he knows it now😂 I knew what he was up to as it’s a trait of most mods who have the kind of access he does.
I’ve been playing him like a Stradivarius.
Too many busybodies on this board.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:36:06 pm
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Danny put his own name up ya silly cvnt. And nobody sent me a PM aboot Coohied. Ralph calls him it on the board.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:34:50 pm
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
You used Noah's real name, or who you think is Noah.

Tick tock indeed.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 01:34:37 pm
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Danny for one. You also used the term cooheid which was said to you in private m to use it against Ellon. I've got loads of PMs from folk back then complaining about different folk posting names and there were a few guilty including you. Not saying you started it but you have involved yourself and allowed it on your board as well
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 01:32:13 pm
All this talk of the other board is boring and not relevant.

We are dealing with the here and now on Peters board.

The clock is ticking towards tea time.

Tick tock, tick tock.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:29:17 pm
Whose name did I post on Danny's board?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 01:28:28 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
But it was banter and funny when it was our names getting splashed over the board. Tune in.😡
Our names? You posted other peoples names on Danny's board as well FFS. You forget that? You also allowed it on your own board as well.

This is Peter's board and he chooses to put it to a vote. You might not even get banned
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 01:24:28 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Are you Noah? Its just that you and AJ said you weren't Noah and I think I've changed my mind
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 01:13:15 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
But it was banter and funny when it was our names getting splashed over the board. Tune in.😡
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest17 on November 20, 2020, 01:09:11 pm
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards

😂😂😂😂😂FFS, you cünts have been doing that about me since day 1😂😂😂😂
Fückin state of you hypocritical cünts😂😂😂😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 12:32:26 pm
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍

I’m sure he’s already said he is boycotting min.

I’ve just put some fizz in the fridge alongside my beers.

I must’ve missed that, happy days, I might have a beer tonight to celebrate.
You miss a lot of things, when it suits. Shitebag.

Woe is me 🎻
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 12:31:40 pm
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?

Woe is me 🎻

I’m sure you’re probably a decent bloke in real life but you’re a complete tadger online min, you go out of your way to antagonise people, you always have done, there’s a reason arguments follow you around on every board you’ve been on.

Did I find it funny? Not overly, like I said I couldn’t really care, same as I couldn’t now, it’s the void it will create in your life that warms my cold heart. 😃
You'll always be a spineless shitebag. It drips from every post.

Im not spineless at all pal, you yourself claim I’m “up in arms at the slightest thing on the other board”

Because I don’t agree with 90% of your posts doesn’t make me spineless. You’re really quite self entitled aren’t you, you fair think you’re a special case that should be held to different standards than others.

Enjoy yer ban. Prick.
My ban will be short term, but you'll be a shitebag forever. 👍

We’ll continue to disagree, yes.

Have a good Christmas.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 12:30:23 pm
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍

I’m sure he’s already said he is boycotting min.

I’ve just put some fizz in the fridge alongside my beers.

I must’ve missed that, happy days, I might have a beer tonight to celebrate.
You miss a lot of things, when it suits. Shitebag.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 12:29:07 pm
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?

Woe is me 🎻

I’m sure you’re probably a decent bloke in real life but you’re a complete tadger online min, you go out of your way to antagonise people, you always have done, there’s a reason arguments follow you around on every board you’ve been on.

Did I find it funny? Not overly, like I said I couldn’t really care, same as I couldn’t now, it’s the void it will create in your life that warms my cold heart. 😃
You'll always be a spineless shitebag. It drips from every post.

Im not spineless at all pal, you yourself claim I’m “up in arms at the slightest thing on the other board”

Because I don’t agree with 90% of your posts doesn’t make me spineless. You’re really quite self entitled aren’t you, you fair think you’re a special case that should be held to different standards than others.

Enjoy yer ban. Prick.
My ban will be short term, but you'll be a shitebag forever. 👍
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 12:22:45 pm
😂😂😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 12:10:24 pm
Do you think mr angry janitor may take it to the supreme court.

EU court of human rights probably.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 12:08:14 pm
Do you think mr angry janitor may take it to the supreme court.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 12:07:16 pm
That's the other poll about up the ban. All very democratic so no complaints

What about voter fraud though?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 12:04:52 pm
That's the other poll about up the ban. All very democratic so no complaints

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 12:03:34 pm
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍

I’m sure he’s already said he is boycotting min.

I’ve just put some fizz in the fridge alongside my beers.

I must’ve missed that, happy days, I might have a beer tonight to celebrate.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 12:02:21 pm
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍

I’m sure he’s already said he is boycotting min.

I’ve just put some fizz in the fridge alongside my beers.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 12:01:01 pm
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍
Can you not read ? 🇬🇧
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 11:58:46 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?

Woe is me 🎻

I’m sure you’re probably a decent bloke in real life but you’re a complete tadger online min, you go out of your way to antagonise people, you always have done, there’s a reason arguments follow you around on every board you’ve been on.

Did I find it funny? Not overly, like I said I couldn’t really care, same as I couldn’t now, it’s the void it will create in your life that warms my cold heart. 😃
You'll always be a spineless shitebag. It drips from every post.

Im not spineless at all pal, you yourself claim I’m “up in arms at the slightest thing on the other board”

Because I don’t agree with 90% of your posts doesn’t make me spineless. You’re really quite self entitled aren’t you, you fair think you’re a special case that should be held to different standards than others.

Enjoy yer ban. Prick.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 11:53:52 am
We just need mo to complete the cabal boycott.

Come on mo. 👍
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 11:53:52 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?

Woe is me 🎻

I’m sure you’re probably a decent bloke in real life but you’re a complete tadger online min, you go out of your way to antagonise people, you always have done, there’s a reason arguments follow you around on every board you’ve been on.

Did I find it funny? Not overly, like I said I couldn’t really care, same as I couldn’t now, it’s the void it will create in your life that warms my cold heart. 😃
You'll always be a spineless shitebag. It drips from every post.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 11:51:14 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?

Woe is me 🎻

I’m sure you’re probably a decent bloke in real life but you’re a complete tadger online min, you go out of your way to antagonise people, you always have done, there’s a reason arguments follow you around on every board you’ve been on.

Did I find it funny? Not overly, like I said I couldn’t really care, same as I couldn’t now, it’s the void it will create in your life that warms my cold heart. 😃
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest19 on November 20, 2020, 11:48:00 am
Excellent news you have my full support mr pantyliner.

Many thanks, Mr Timbo.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 11:45:40 am
Excellent news you have my full support mr pantyliner.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest19 on November 20, 2020, 11:43:40 am
I stand in solidarity with my brothers and will also sit out until any ban is up.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 11:39:51 am
Anyway. If the admin don’t put a No ban option I won’t be voting and I’m out until AJs ban is up
I stand with you brother 🇬🇧
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 11:37:09 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Of course you couldn't, because you're a two faced, hypocritical shitebag. And you always will be. Still think it was funny when my full name was posted?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 11:37:07 am
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
It’s not disgusting.

You seem to have a bit of a patronising attitude regarding women. They are adults and I don’t know a single woman who would have any issue with it.

Some may see it as childish but so what?

It was used daily by Ralph and nobody complained.

Sorry, I don’t think you’re being genuine.
In your opinion it is not disgusting.

And how can your poll be ethical if there is not a choice for no ban ?
Doxxing falls within Executive purview due to the legislative aspect.

You can seek to overturn the absence by posting an amendment motion with a poll on whether or not a ban should be applied at all in this instance but you can’t be bothered.

I have advised your of the remedial course for your dissatisfaction and I can do no more than that.
Sometimes you can be very smarmy.
If you want to run an ethical board then there should be a choice of no ban. If that is not a choice this whole thing is a complete farce
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:37:02 am
Anyway. If the admin don’t put a No ban option I won’t be voting and I’m out until AJs ban is up
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:34:27 am
Maybe I wouldn’t. I could safely say Iv probably enjoyed the company of women as much if not more then anyone on here.
I don’t feel the need to talk on message boards about them though
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 11:32:10 am
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
It’s not disgusting.

You seem to have a bit of a patronising attitude regarding women. They are adults and I don’t know a single woman who would have any issue with it.

Some may see it as childish but so what?

It was used daily by Ralph and nobody complained.

Sorry, I don’t think you’re being genuine.
In your opinion it is not disgusting.

And how can your poll be ethical if there is not a choice for no ban ?
Doxxing falls within Executive purview due to the legislative aspect.

You can seek to overturn the absence by posting an amendment motion with a poll on whether or not a ban should be applied at all in this instance but you can’t be bothered.

I have advised your of the remedial course for your dissatisfaction and I can do no more than that.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 11:30:20 am
Also it isn't real
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:30:14 am
Then read back a few weeks Peter .I posted on a thread about it
Patronising towards women? Are you for real?
Send a female friend a gif of it .Do it continually .See if they are happy about it.
Never heard so much rubbish in my life
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 11:29:49 am
AgainMoA if you look I cast no comment on the thread.
I’m not against pretty women posing like on page 3.
It’s their choice. I’m in favour of choice and women of beauty are a nice choice to look at
Blokes posting pictures of other blokes chugging probably should be on grinder mate
Let’s just say if he kept sending that txt to the group of lads I’m mates with he’d be blanked after a couple of occasions of it happening or in some cases grabbed around the throat and told to take himself and his sexual perversion elsewhere
You may be ok with it but I think i stinks and is usually a insult to someone anyway
JTC you would hate my group chats with pals then :)
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 11:29:38 am
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
It’s not disgusting.

You seem to have a bit of a patronising attitude regarding women. They are adults and I don’t know a single woman who would have any issue with it.

Some may see it as childish but so what?

It was used daily by Ralph and nobody complained.

Sorry, I don’t think you’re being genuine.
In your opinion it is not disgusting.

And how can your poll be ethical if there is not a choice for no ban ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:26:46 am
He can say what he likes on here Mo.Protected species
If he mouthed of in the streets to people like he does on here it would be painful for the youth to say the least
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 11:24:38 am
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
It’s not disgusting.

You seem to have a bit of a patronising attitude regarding women. They are adults and I don’t know a single woman who would have any issue with it.

Some may see it as childish but so what?

It was used daily by Ralph and nobody complained.

Sorry, I don’t think you’re being genuine.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 11:20:54 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.

There is factual evidence Mo, what part of that are you struggling with?
I have not seen any evidence.

And why do you post about my wife ?
Do you really think that is aaceptable ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:16:04 am
AgainMoA if you look I cast no comment on the thread.
I’m not against pretty women posing like on page 3.
It’s their choice. I’m in favour of choice and women of beauty are a nice choice to look at
Blokes posting pictures of other blokes chugging probably should be on grinder mate
Let’s just say if he kept sending that txt to the group of lads I’m mates with he’d be blanked after a couple of occasions of it happening or in some cases grabbed around the throat and told to take himself and his sexual perversion elsewhere
You may be ok with it but I think i stinks and is usually a insult to someone anyway
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 11:14:13 am
Clutching at straws
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:07:47 am
Not sensitive at all MoA. I’m a man of the world. I just think it’s disgusting and if a women saw it t wouldn’t  be great would it? Ok there are no women  at present on here I get that.
I find it childish if I’m honest too.
People can do what they like for me but don’t implode it on me. I’m on record on here for saying it’s disgusting a few week back
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 11:05:32 am
MoA, correct though I will bet in most cases it’s a reply to coynes idea of the ‘craic’
Personally I won’t be voting unless a No Ban option is allowed.
If you are worried about women being offended then Hardliner's post about which women would you want a 3some with might be up there. For the record I see nothing the matter with either that post or the GIF
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 11:01:05 am
MoA, correct though I will bet in most cases it’s a reply to coynes idea of the ‘craic’
Personally I won’t be voting unless a No Ban option is allowed.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 11:00:05 am
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?
I thought you were joking about the Jack Nicholson Gif. It is off a movie and it isn't real. It came from the old board where Ralph used it

Bit sensitive mate?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:59:48 am
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?

Do you personally find the Jack Nicholson gif offensive?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:58:47 am
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...
And folk mocking him about a relationship breakup and going on about how they think he is not seeing his kid. 2 wrongs don't make a right i'm sure you agree

I'd rather it was all cut out and we just powered each other about football and the odd political debate

Correct, JTC must have missed those posts 🤷‍♂️
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:57:05 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.

There is factual evidence Mo, what part of that are you struggling with?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 10:56:58 am
Still no answer off the head honcho about sex perv posts and the damage they could cause to the image of this place or offence to any would be women Members?
Thing is if women or wife’s and girlfriends do look in be they slim or the size coyne likes to think some of the other board members other half’s are they ain’t going to like it are they?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:56:26 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.
He should have just apologised like I suggested and maybe it wouldn't have got to this
And coyne, should he apologise?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:53:29 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.
He should have just apologised like I suggested and maybe it wouldn't have got to this
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:52:46 am
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...
And folk mocking him about a relationship breakup and going on about how they think he is not seeing his kid. 2 wrongs don't make a right i'm sure you agree

I'd rather it was all cut out and we just powered each other about football and the odd political debate
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 10:50:57 am
Knocking blokes for living in council houses!
Classy stuff from coyne again.
Let’s be honest some of the bile he comes out with on here if he had the balls to come out with it in the street he would get a serious slapping
Live your the sword etc...
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:50:14 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
I should not have to do that. If this was an ethical forum that option would be there. AJ has thrown under the bus and been found guilty on your say so. That is not ethical or democratic. The choices on the poll are not either.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:44:00 am
If AJ had continued to post hints about knowing stuff about Coyne there would be no ban. If he made jokes about him not seeing his kid and the breakup of his relationship there would be no ban. If he continued the personal tft with Coyne there would be no ban

He posted Coyne's name and that is why Peter has decided to put up the poll.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 10:40:50 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?

Feel free to table an amendment in the form of a counter motion with your own poll.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:39:45 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
I don't know, ask him. I have no idea why he asked you that. I'm asking why you said he shouldn't be eating fries all of a sudden?
Use your assuming mode Fremsley. Why do you think I did?
Well going by what has happened i think you have been fed incorrect info about Coyne and used it on the board. Now my advice would be to stop putting your trust in people you have never met because sometimes it can make you look silly 🙂
Ffs I have been fed no information about coyne. He is the last person on here that I would want to know anything about.
I do not need your advice or you assumptions.
I get it though it is okay in your eyes for him to assume that my wife and I are large but when I say it about him you assume things and make on its a conspiracy. Good one, now take your mock outrage and ask coyne why he posted on more than one occasion what he did.
I refer you to my previous post
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:39:41 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Where is the no ban option ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:39:31 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.

Cheers, I’ll go and put some beer in the fridge so they are nice and chilled for 5-6pm.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:38:20 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
I don't know, ask him. I have no idea why he asked you that. I'm asking why you said he shouldn't be eating fries all of a sudden?
Use your assuming mode Fremsley. Why do you think I did?
Well going by what has happened i think you have been fed incorrect info about Coyne and used it on the board. Now my advice would be to stop putting your trust in people you have never met because sometimes it can make you look silly 🙂
Ffs I have been fed no information about coyne. He is the last person on here that I would want to know anything about.
I do not need your advice or you assumptions.
I get it though it is okay in your eyes for him to assume that my wife and I are large but when I say it about him you assume things and make on its a conspiracy. Good one, now take your mock outrage and ask coyne why he posted on more than one occasion what he did.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:38:05 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
I would say that is uncalled for

What is your opinion on searching for private info about posters and posting hints and names on public messageboards
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 10:36:28 am
What time does the vote close?

I dunno, I think we need to give it a good 8 or 9 hours or the equivalent of a working day. People will want to consider their vote carefully.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 10:36:09 am
I get that ED.There is no need for it. As a new poster Iv been astonished at what TScoyne or whoever he is today gets away with. See who starts the abuse most of the time!
In real life I put up with people talking to to me like a lady’s front bottom very little. I give them a warning then I’m all over them like a rash.The kids getting lippy where I’m concerned
I won’t be holding back forever
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:36:05 am
MOA, your outrage over AJ would look more genuine if you were to take Coyne to task in the same way for doing the same thing to Brother Mo.

#JustSayin
I'm not outraged. I just don't think people should be going out their way to find out info about posters. It is very creepy. You need to remember I put forward the idea of him apologising and we move on. You seem to forget that

Why do you preach about consistency when you refuse to do so yourself. You are often jumping into stuff and defending certain folk but turning a blind eye to other issues. In fact I'd say you are notorious for it

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:34:59 am
Morning all. Great to see everyone getting along on this ethical Friday.

Morning Mr Rambo, how are you?

It’s a fabulous Friday, I’m looking forward to the weekend with my daughter and weeks holiday next week.

Great mr coyne. Just returned from my morning jog and logged on to see the board in civil war! I might nip out to the shop for some popcorn.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:30:29 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
I don't know, ask him. I have no idea why he asked you that. I'm asking why you said he shouldn't be eating fries all of a sudden?
Use your assuming mode Fremsley. Why do you think I did?
Well going by what has happened i think you have been fed incorrect info about Coyne and used it on the board. Now my advice would be to stop putting your trust in people you have never met because sometimes it can make you look silly 🙂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest19 on November 20, 2020, 10:30:14 am
MOA, your outrage over AJ would look more genuine if you were to take Coyne to task in the same way for doing the same thing to Brother Mo.

#JustSayin
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:29:09 am
What a state you are in mr deemo. A long walk and some fresh air might clear your head. Just a thought.
Just a thought, shut up
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:28:36 am
Morning all. Great to see everyone getting along on this ethical Friday.

Morning Mr Rambo, how are you?

It’s a fabulous Friday, I’m looking forward to the weekend with my daughter and weeks holiday next week.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:28:21 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
I don't know, ask him. I have no idea why he asked you that. I'm asking why you said he shouldn't be eating fries all of a sudden?
Use your assuming mode Fremsley. Why do you think I did?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:27:56 am
What a state you are in mr deemo. A long walk and some fresh air might clear your head. Just a thought.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:26:48 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Ffs he posted on more than one occasion insuating my wife and I are large.
Enough said
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: mrs timbo on November 20, 2020, 10:26:37 am
Morning all. Great to see everyone getting along on this ethical Friday.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:26:19 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
I don't know, ask him. I have no idea why he asked you that. I'm asking why you said he shouldn't be eating fries all of a sudden?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:25:25 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Nasty as well. Another horrible snat cu#t. All the fuc#ing same


For goodness sakes Mo can't you post in a thread without bringing up snats and the like . ::)

Why do you do that during a serious thread ?
I will bring up the snats when I want.
 Why do you start a thread about a rival team of the one you clsim to support and say enjoy then get offended when another poster completely rips your post apart ?
Who do you support ? Aberdeen? Celtic?
SNP=IRA=CELTIC 🖕
 
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:25:15 am
I know a lot of names between Danny's board and Pete's I even know AJs but I'd never share them with anyone it's up to them if they don't care about sharing their name .

Not sure why AJ would do that.
He didn't

He did, there is evidence in the form of a screenshot before it was deleted.

Hope that helps, now calm down.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:24:40 am
At least we know aj will take his time in the cooler to reflect on his actions and never mention it upon his return, he’s not a man to hold a grudge.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Buc on November 20, 2020, 10:24:24 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question


Nobody has a scooby about your weight and indeed nothing about your wife

People can post anything about me I don't give a dam but some like to be private about certain things .
I have always respected that .
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:20:55 am
STOP THE COUNTING!!!
SHUT UP
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:20:22 am
I know a lot of names between Danny's board and Pete's I even know AJs but I'd never share them with anyone it's up to them if they don't care about sharing their name .

Not sure why AJ would do that.
He didn't
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:19:02 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Seriously, what was coyne getting at in his post about my wifes and my weight for?
One simple question
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Buc on November 20, 2020, 10:18:52 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Nasty as well. Another horrible snat cu#t. All the fuc#ing same


For goodness sakes Mo can't you post in a thread without bringing up snats and the like . ::)

Why do you do that during a serious thread ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:18:16 am
STOP THE COUNTING!!!
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:16:57 am
What time does the vote close?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:16:53 am
I’m disappointed in the boards moral compass calling me a c#nt and an ar#ehole whilst at the same time clutching his pearls.

Suck ma balls mo ye wet salad.
Oh my goodness 🙈 Another snowhite 🤡
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Buc on November 20, 2020, 10:14:31 am
I know a lot of names between Danny's board and Pete's I even know AJs but I'd never share them with anyone it's up to them if they don't care about sharing their name .

Not sure why AJ would do that.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:14:11 am
It’s disgusting ED. The kid gets away with murder on here and slags people of on a personal level. Let’s go back a few weeks when I was in your lovely country on holiday and I was having people praise me for not being abusive.I don’t abuse anyone yet that kid gets away with vile posts.
Live by the sword etc...
I won’t be voting as there is no option for not banning.

I don’t condone the behaviour of either jtc, the threads that descend into slagging each other about fat wives, only seeing yer kids at weekends etc make my eyes bleed. Pete says aj posted Coyne’s surname and he had to delete it so aj can have no complaints about the punishment, if he’d said sorry I’d have had no complaints if Pete had decided that was the matter closed.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 10:12:00 am
About time you answered me Pete.I really think you need to rid the board of posts like he posts. Imagine a women looking in on that?
Far More serious than what AJ has or hasn’t posted
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:09:25 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Sake, Mo i'm asking one simple question. What was the reason you asked it? Why so defensive?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:09:12 am
I’m disappointed in the boards moral compass calling me a c#nt and an ar#ehole whilst at the same time clutching his pearls.

Suck ma balls mo ye wet salad.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:09:02 am
Mo, I suggest you calm down, you are getting affy worked up.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:07:52 am
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Listen to you snow fuc#king white.
Fu#king ars#hole

How rude 😩
Jog on, you need to
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:06:37 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
What is coyne on about on more than 1 occasion saying that he dreds to think what the combined weight of my wife and I are ?
Is that acceptable ? Simple question
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:06:29 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

So you are admitting now, that’s good.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 10:06:28 am
It’s disgusting ED. The kid gets away with murder on here and slags people of on a personal level. Let’s go back a few weeks when I was in your lovely country on holiday and I was having people praise me for not being abusive.I don’t abuse anyone yet that kid gets away with vile posts.
Live by the sword etc...
I won’t be voting as there is no option for not banning.

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:06:13 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Aaawwww,Cooheid's found his voice. 🐄 😂

It’s yer poor Mrs I feel sorry for, it’s all she’s gonnae hear for the next 30 days.

“That **** Pete.......”
My folks, AJs mrs, there is a theme running here.
Ars#hole

(https://i.postimg.cc/s2KwV4ZV/5-B94873-F-3906-494-A-ACB1-3-B665001-C744.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/FfdjpcZq)

Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:04:25 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Nasty as well. Another horrible snat cu#t. All the fuc#ing same
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 10:03:38 am
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Listen to you snow fuc#king white.
Fu#king ars#hole

How rude 😩
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:03:13 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Aaawwww,Cooheid's found his voice. 🐄 😂

It’s yer poor Mrs I feel sorry for, it’s all she’s gonnae hear for the next 30 days.

“That **** Pete.......”
My folks, AJs mrs, there is a theme running here.
Ars#hole
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:02:42 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.

I couldn’t really give a **** now either to be honest, my pleasure in this is purely how much it’ll kill you not being able to post on here or the other board.

See ye pal.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:01:44 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
What were you on about when you implied that Coyne shouldn't be eating fries? Simple question :)
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 10:01:18 am
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Thank the ralphster for the chugging Gif. Not really sure the big deal with it. It's not actually real
Neither was the name I posted. But when my real name was posted it was all a big joke. Weird eh?

That might hold some water on here if Pete had been running that board but he wasn’t. You’ll need to take up that grievance with Danny.

All this could have been avoided if you’d just said sorry. SAD
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:01:18 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
Shut up
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 10:00:21 am
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Thank the ralphster for the chugging Gif. Not really sure the big deal with it. It's not actually real
Neither was the name I posted. But when my real name was posted it was all a big joke. Weird eh?
Nope I never made a joke about it

This is the current board though. Fresh start. I was one of the few that put forward that you apologise and we move on so don't have a go at me
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 10:00:14 am
Where’s the forever option?
Shut up

Your folks nae needing their shopping done or something? Gees peace ye yappy ****.
Again shut up. Bringing my folks into this, says a lot you pr@ck
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:59:36 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
You didn't give a **** when it was me on the end of it ya spineless shitebag. It was all a laugh.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:58:44 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Simple question again, what are you slavering about ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:58:36 am
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Thank the ralphster for the chugging Gif. Not really sure the big deal with it. It's not actually real
Neither was the name I posted. But when my real name was posted it was all a big joke. Weird eh?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:57:40 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards

Personal info ye eejit.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 09:57:08 am
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Thank the ralphster for the chugging Gif. Not really sure the big deal with it. It's not actually real
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:56:40 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
What a lot of smarry pi@h. Where is the no ban option and why the fu#k do you let coyne post the things he does without anything happening? Double standards
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:55:47 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Aaawwww,Cooheid's found his voice. 🐄 😂

It’s yer poor Mrs I feel sorry for, it’s all she’s gonnae hear for the next 30 days.

“That **** Pete.......”
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:54:19 am
Where’s the forever option?
Shut up

Your folks nae needing their shopping done or something? Gees peace ye yappy ****.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 09:53:37 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Simple question, Mo why are you so agitated?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:53:21 am
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Listen to you snow fuc#king white.
Fu#king ars#hole
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:52:46 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Aaawwww,Cooheid's found his voice. 🐄 😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:52:11 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Don’t blame me for this situation.
Doxxing is both a civil and criminal offence under several UK Parliament Acts and in Scots Law.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest19 on November 20, 2020, 09:51:59 am
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.

Agreed 100%

The mock outrage from him is beyond belief.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 09:51:21 am
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.

AJ overstepped the mark badly, let’s move on.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest20 on November 20, 2020, 09:51:11 am
So where is the No Ban option?
Also can we have a poll for excluding blokes who post images of other blokes having a Tommy Tank?
What would you do Pete if we got women members on here? Would it be all good ‘craic’ cos Coynes dresses up as Braveheart or would you have to either ban him or warn him of a ban due to his perverted ways?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:51:02 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.

See ye pal. 👋

Banned from both boards 😂

That will kill you inside, your two options are go back to ger Harley or talk to yourself on your own board.

Have a merry Christmas.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:50:51 am
Where’s the forever option?
Shut up
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:50:43 am
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.
Exactly. The vote is a farce and Pete knows it. Still, it won't change certain things. 😎
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:49:56 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Wtf are you havering about ? Seriously ?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:48:33 am
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
There has to be a no ban option or the vote is not ethical at all.
Coyne has posted some horrendous stuff on here and is now pretending to be outraged and upset. Absolutey pathetic.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:48:21 am
The fact he’s trying to act like his posts over the last 3 days or so are merely a coincidence is the stuff of 5yr olds.

I’d swear the **** was an only child growing up. 😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 09:47:53 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.
Why do you call him cooheid btw?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:46:17 am
Where’s the forever option?
Danny's erse is needing licked. Toddle off.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 09:45:41 am
Also, on AJs return from whatever length of ban.

If the offence is repeated, punishment should be a lot more severe imo.

Hardliner and Mo sticking up for AJ, even though he has clearly crossed a line and there is evidence, snigger 😂
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:45:31 am
Remember your mantra when you started the board, Pete. "I don't make the rules, the members decide". Have a think about that. You're in danger here of turning this board into another sf.net or Faniel’s. Be careful.👍
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 09:44:40 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
What was your post on the sweet potato fries thread all about?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Cooheid on November 20, 2020, 09:44:35 am
Where’s the forever option?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest19 on November 20, 2020, 09:42:29 am
If Fanny is Coyne's surname then I'll start referring to him as a lady's front bottom instead.

There should be no ban IMO, unless it is also matched with a ban for Coyne.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:38:50 am
So there is not a no ban option. Nof very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
10/10. 👍
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest16 on November 20, 2020, 09:38:16 am
So there is not a no ban option. Not very ethical at all. 
What a lot of sh#te especially after what that pr#ck coyne  has posted in the past.
Take your coyne tinted specs off Peter.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:35:11 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
You posted his surname.
Did I?  ???
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:30:45 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
You posted his surname.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:29:11 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Nope. And no actual name was posted. How many men do you know called Fanny? 😁
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:27:20 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
You did.

With the lack of remorse and no admission of guilt there has to be something.

I take zero pleasure in it and it would be the same process if it was Coyne who had done it to you, or if it was anyone even.

I don’t get it. You do absolutely fine at handling yourself without any need to cross that line.

Look, seriously for a second, were you pished?
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Sir Brenty on November 20, 2020, 09:25:11 am
I don’t think AJ should be getting to vote on this.
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: Fremsley on November 20, 2020, 09:23:09 am
I did say he could apologise and we move on but he has refused to do so :(
Title: Re: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining the AJ
Post by: guest3 on November 20, 2020, 09:23:05 am
No I didn't.

Where's the no ban at all option?
Title: Motion on disciplinary measures pertaining to AJ
Post by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 09:17:23 am
On the 19th of November 2020, Brother AJ did knowingly, wilfully and with malice aforethought post personal details of a fellow board user, specifically his name, in order to seek to engender fear, alarm or general rattlement.

This is a transgression in terms of the community’s ethicicity.

A Community Sanction is hereby proposed.

Poll attached to this thread.