EthicalScottishFitba
General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: PeterGrant on November 20, 2020, 07:15:51 am
-
Yet again.
😂😂😂
-
Absolute gold 😂😂😂
-
Last night in my bed I had cause to delete a post by you in which you creepily and maliciously posted another poster’s name without their consent.
I am grieved by this as I always understood you to know how to dance along the line with wind ups without crossing it. I just don’t understand why you felt the need to cross that line. You give absolutely as good as you get and are not a victim here.
It will need to be a matter for the forum, but please state your defence.
Has someone complained?
Yes.
Who?
Me.
-
Last night in my bed I had cause to delete a post by you in which you creepily and maliciously posted another poster’s name without their consent.
I am grieved by this as I always understood you to know how to dance along the line with wind ups without crossing it. I just don’t understand why you felt the need to cross that line. You give absolutely as good as you get and are not a victim here.
It will need to be a matter for the forum, but please state your defence.
Has someone complained?
Yes.
Who?
-
Last night in my bed I had cause to delete a post by you in which you creepily and maliciously posted another poster’s name without their consent.
I am grieved by this as I always understood you to know how to dance along the line with wind ups without crossing it. I just don’t understand why you felt the need to cross that line. You give absolutely as good as you get and are not a victim here.
It will need to be a matter for the forum, but please state your defence.
Has someone complained?
Yes.
-
Last night in my bed I had cause to delete a post by you in which you creepily and maliciously posted another poster’s name without their consent.
I am grieved by this as I always understood you to know how to dance along the line with wind ups without crossing it. I just don’t understand why you felt the need to cross that line. You give absolutely as good as you get and are not a victim here.
It will need to be a matter for the forum, but please state your defence.
Has someone complained?
-
How does anyone know the names of other posters anyway? ???
They don't. It's just a load of paranoid nonsense. It was fine when it was my real name though, good banter that.
-
How does anyone know the names of other posters anyway? ???
-
Ok mr pantyliner.
-
If I feel a discussion has ran it's course I've lost the discussion I will leave the thread rather than argue the bit all day long. Could you provide examples of this bullying behaviour mr pantyliner?
Fixed that for you.
I can, but I don't feel compelled to, Mr Timbo.
-
If I feel a discussion has ran it's course I will leave the thread rather than argue the bit all day long. Could you provide examples of this bullying behaviour mr pantyliner?
-
Have you asked any of your chums to stop calling other posters silly names as well mr deemo?
Eh?
-
Have you asked any of your chums to stop calling other posters silly names as well mr deemo?
Deemo is very impressionable, Mr Rambo
Away from the political rants and meltdowns I do think he is fine but I wish he would just be his own man
-
Who have I bullied mr pantyliner?
You haven't actually managed to bully anyone, because the people you have directed your behaviour toward are made of strong stuff, Mr Timbo. From your perspective, these have always been failed missions.
You have, however, displayed the mentality of a baby and flounced from discussions when pressed for answers ;D ;)
-
Have you asked any of your chums to stop calling other posters silly names as well mr deemo?
-
Who have I bullied mr pantyliner?
🙈 Pathetic
-
I'll decide what I post mr deemo but thanks for your input.
I just asked politely not to 👍
-
What have I done to upset you now mr pantyliner?
Please stop calling him that. Thank you 👍
Why? I'm sure he is fine with it plus it took me ages to think it up
It is pathetic 👍
-
Who have I bullied mr pantyliner?
-
An example of what?
Your bullying behaviour, Mr Timbo.
-
I'll decide what I post mr deemo but thanks for your input.
-
What have I done to upset you now mr pantyliner?
Please stop calling him that. Thank you 👍
Why? I'm sure he is fine with it plus it took me ages to think it up
-
What have I done to upset you now mr pantyliner?
Please stop calling him that. Thank you 👍
-
An example of what?
-
So why have you brought my name into things? What is it I'm supposed to have done?
Because I was using you as an example, Mr Timbo.
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
I hope you agree that going out your way to find out info of a poster is out of order. I can't speak for anyone but myself but I don't use peoples personal info against them whether I know it and certainly wouldn't search for it. If we continue to reference old boards then this will just end up like them.
I did say "I thought you were thin" when you posted a photo of yourself in jest but I wasn't meaning you were fat. As a broad shouldered man myself I hope you took it as it was :)
I've possibly got quite a bit to lose on here if posters decided they felt the need to use it as some on here know quite a lot about me including my current employers although that may be changing very soon. I 'd rather we all and I mean everyone kept the banter to the kind of stuff you would slag your mates off about in a pub. Slagging and mocking certain stuff is totally fine and to be honest I really don't get offended by anything really, and can take a fair powering. Being a Dundee fan I have thick skin
This is a hand across the rightie leftie divide so if I speak to my people and you speak to yours we can hopefully work out a more respectful ethical board going forward and once the toys are back in the parm :D
I don't know if anyone went out their way to get info or not and don't know what was posted, so it's hard for me to comment in that regard.
I think we can reference old boards in terms of talking about outrage and morality though. Past actions undoubtedly sway current actions.
I have no beef (excuse the pun!) with your comments regarding my Gazza photo and found them to be quite funny if truth be told!
Completely agree re:pub banter.
I also lean over and extend my hand over the divide. I think my people (indigenous whites ;) ) will automatically play things ethically if respect is shown to them. They are rounded on by the masses regularly. Check comments from Mr Timbo and Ellon who have been spewing without knowing the full facts just to get at them. The dynamic has been like this since I joined up here, and I get the impression it was even worse on the old board.
I admire 'my people' for sticking up for themselves in the face of constant adversity. They are made of strong stuff.
Unfortunately the rounding goes on all over the board. Buc and Mr Rambo are often left to defend for themselves if nobody is on. That can't be denied. That has all come from AJ falling out with Mr Rambo over nothing on the previous board and it has spilled over here. That can't be a good thing if we want the board to prosper. I agree with a lot of your post as well though so no need to drag this out any further than needed
AJ falling out with people is the main and most important point, he’s done it for years.
Watch the board flourish in his absence.
-
So why have you brought my name into things? What is it I'm supposed to have done?
-
What have I done to upset you now mr pantyliner?
You haven't upset me, Mr Timbo.
-
What have I done to upset you now mr pantyliner?
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
I hope you agree that going out your way to find out info of a poster is out of order. I can't speak for anyone but myself but I don't use peoples personal info against them whether I know it and certainly wouldn't search for it. If we continue to reference old boards then this will just end up like them.
I did say "I thought you were thin" when you posted a photo of yourself in jest but I wasn't meaning you were fat. As a broad shouldered man myself I hope you took it as it was :)
I've possibly got quite a bit to lose on here if posters decided they felt the need to use it as some on here know quite a lot about me including my current employers although that may be changing very soon. I 'd rather we all and I mean everyone kept the banter to the kind of stuff you would slag your mates off about in a pub. Slagging and mocking certain stuff is totally fine and to be honest I really don't get offended by anything really, and can take a fair powering. Being a Dundee fan I have thick skin
This is a hand across the rightie leftie divide so if I speak to my people and you speak to yours we can hopefully work out a more respectful ethical board going forward and once the toys are back in the parm :D
I don't know if anyone went out their way to get info or not and don't know what was posted, so it's hard for me to comment in that regard.
I think we can reference old boards in terms of talking about outrage and morality though. Past actions undoubtedly sway current actions.
I have no beef (excuse the pun!) with your comments regarding my Gazza photo and found them to be quite funny if truth be told!
Completely agree re:pub banter.
I also lean over and extend my hand over the divide. I think my people (indigenous whites ;) ) will automatically play things ethically if respect is shown to them. They are rounded on by the masses regularly. Check comments from Mr Timbo and Ellon who have been spewing without knowing the full facts just to get at them. The dynamic has been like this since I joined up here, and I get the impression it was even worse on the old board.
I admire 'my people' for sticking up for themselves in the face of constant adversity. They are made of strong stuff.
Unfortunately the rounding goes on all over the board. Buc and Mr Rambo are often left to defend for themselves if nobody is on. That can't be denied. That has all come from AJ falling out with Mr Rambo over nothing on the previous board and it has spilled over here. That can't be a good thing if we want the board to prosper. I agree with a lot of your post as well though so no need to drag this out any further than needed
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
I hope you agree that going out your way to find out info of a poster is out of order. I can't speak for anyone but myself but I don't use peoples personal info against them whether I know it and certainly wouldn't search for it. If we continue to reference old boards then this will just end up like them.
I did say "I thought you were thin" when you posted a photo of yourself in jest but I wasn't meaning you were fat. As a broad shouldered man myself I hope you took it as it was :)
I've possibly got quite a bit to lose on here if posters decided they felt the need to use it as some on here know quite a lot about me including my current employers although that may be changing very soon. I 'd rather we all and I mean everyone kept the banter to the kind of stuff you would slag your mates off about in a pub. Slagging and mocking certain stuff is totally fine and to be honest I really don't get offended by anything really, and can take a fair powering. Being a Dundee fan I have thick skin
This is a hand across the rightie leftie divide so if I speak to my people and you speak to yours we can hopefully work out a more respectful ethical board going forward and once the toys are back in the parm :D
I don't know if anyone went out their way to get info or not and don't know what was posted, so it's hard for me to comment in that regard.
I think we can reference old boards in terms of talking about outrage and morality though. Past actions undoubtedly sway current actions.
I have no beef (excuse the pun!) with your comments regarding my Gazza photo and found them to be quite funny if truth be told!
Completely agree re:pub banter.
I also lean over and extend my hand over the divide. I think my people (indigenous whites ;) ) will automatically play things ethically if respect is shown to them. They are rounded on by the masses regularly. Check comments from Mr Timbo and Ellon who have been spewing without knowing the full facts just to get at them. The dynamic has been like this since I joined up here, and I get the impression it was even worse on the old board.
I admire 'my people' for sticking up for themselves in the face of constant adversity. They are made of strong stuff.
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
I hope you agree that going out your way to find out info of a poster is out of order. I can't speak for anyone but myself but I don't use peoples personal info against them whether I know it and certainly wouldn't search for it. If we continue to reference old boards then this will just end up like them.
I did say "I thought you were thin" when you posted a photo of yourself in jest but I wasn't meaning you were fat. As a broad shouldered man myself I hope you took it as it was :)
I've possibly got quite a bit to lose on here if posters decided they felt the need to use it as some on here know quite a lot about me including my current employers although that may be changing very soon. I 'd rather we all and I mean everyone kept the banter to the kind of stuff you would slag your mates off about in a pub. Slagging and mocking certain stuff is totally fine and to be honest I really don't get offended by anything really, and can take a fair powering. Being a Dundee fan I have thick skin
This is a hand across the rightie leftie divide so if I speak to my people and you speak to yours we can hopefully work out a more respectful ethical board going forward and once the toys are back in the parm :D
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
No it wouldn’t and I won’t.
Have a fabulous Friday brother
-
I think you'd prove yourself as a highly ethical man if you took a voluntary ban on the chin to go alongside AJ's.
That would be the right thing to do at this point.
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter. It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either. I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.
I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed.
Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.
Ok hardliner I know you are good friends with Peter and respect him but just saying the denial of it has run it's course I think. I mentioned yesterday that posts had been made by AJ hinting at personal info and looking back from other posters as well so looks to have been shared already. Later that night a post is made with Coyne's name in it. Seems coincidence eh?
I'd rather not go down the route of the early days of Danny's board or the mad board where people can't have a barney without actively finding out info to use against posters. New board, fresh start ethical etc but if posters just want to reference previous boards to justify their actions then really it will be doomed imo
I admire the general spirit of your post mate. It's hard for me to comment when I don't know what was posted tbh, but I just think that the wider context matters and that Coyne's role in what may or may not have been done should be acknowledged.
I’m going to for 84.
That will be the number of times you mention me before the day is out
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter. It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either. I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.
I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed.
Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.
Ok hardliner I know you are good friends with Peter and respect him but just saying the denial of it has run it's course I think. I mentioned yesterday that posts had been made by AJ hinting at personal info and looking back from other posters as well so looks to have been shared already. Later that night a post is made with Coyne's name in it. Seems coincidence eh?
I'd rather not go down the route of the early days of Danny's board or the mad board where people can't have a barney without actively finding out info to use against posters. New board, fresh start ethical etc but if posters just want to reference previous boards to justify their actions then really it will be doomed imo
I admire the general spirit of your post mate. It's hard for me to comment when I don't know what was posted tbh, but I just think that the wider context matters and that Coyne's role in what may or may not have been done should be acknowledged.
-
Ethical board ;D
Admin.😂
I'm not Admin here
You're not admin anywhere ffs.😂
Ok
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter. It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either. I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.
I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed.
Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.
Ok hardliner I know you are good friends with Peter and respect him but just saying the denial of it has run it's course I think. I mentioned yesterday that posts had been made by AJ hinting at personal info and looking back from other posters as well so looks to have been shared already. Later that night a post is made with Coyne's name in it. Seems coincidence eh?
I'd rather not go down the route of the early days of Danny's board or the mad board where people can't have a barney without actively finding out info to use against posters. New board, fresh start ethical etc but if posters just want to reference previous boards to justify their actions then really it will be doomed imo
The early days? There was threats made this year and your pal Coyne lapped them up and found them funny, until Danny shat on him.😁
-
Ethical board ;D
Admin.😂
I'm not Admin here
You're not admin anywhere ffs.😂
-
Remember that MoA knows Brenty personally and won't say a word against him. For that reason his opinions mean less than nothing.
Which is lucky as I was able to call you out early about you hinting about finding private info about, Coyne
-
Ethical board ;D
Admin.😂
I'm not Admin here
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter. It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either. I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.
I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed.
Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.
Ok hardliner I know you are good friends with Peter and respect him but just saying the denial of it has run it's course I think. I mentioned yesterday that posts had been made by AJ hinting at personal info and looking back from other posters as well so looks to have been shared already. Later that night a post is made with Coyne's name in it. Seems coincidence eh?
I'd rather not go down the route of the early days of Danny's board or the mad board where people can't have a barney without actively finding out info to use against posters. New board, fresh start ethical etc but if posters just want to reference previous boards to justify their actions then really it will be doomed imo
-
Remember that MoA knows Brenty personally and won't say a word against him. For that reason his opinions mean less than nothing.
-
Ethical board ;D
Admin.😂
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
I actually do trust what you say, MOA, and I seeing the toing and froing between us as banter. It's not as black and white as that though, and I've no reason to distrust AJ either. I think things can also be taken the wrong way, misconstrued, or spun a certain way to suit an agenda.
I also think that things can be done as a reaction, and that we should take this into account even if a 'crime' was committed and even if the original stuff was done on another board.
Your implied accusation of me not giving Peter respect is like a dagger to the heart.
-
I think aj may have had a few too many last night.
Expect "here comes "****heid"
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
I don't see any reason why you wouldn't trust what I say to you on a level. That is up to you
AJ did post his name, AJ did hint on a thread he knew personal info. Other posters have hinted about it so they know. Perhaps you do also. This is Peter's board who so far has done really well. How about give the man some respect and stop all this denial stuff, AJ can just admit it then we can move on and not mention it again?
-
I think aj may have had a few too many last night.
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
All I'm saying, MOA, is that I'm looking at the bigger picture here. You guys go daft at him for allegedly doing stuff that isn't as bad as what was done to him, which also never seems to be mentioned. There is no outrage.
There's a high horse mentality within your group.
If AJ was to apologise then I agree that'd be fine, however only if he is actually guilty? Also, I think it'd be better for it to be accompanied by an all encompassing apology from Coyne for his recent actions as well as worse actions on a previous board. This could stop situations like this from ever arising again IMO.
-
Ethical board ;D
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.
Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.
Personally, I think a works phone number is far more tangible and dangerous to be posted than a name, especially when it was followed up by a threat to use the number.
That's IF you even posted the name, and it sounds like you didn't.
Peter has the evidence Hardliner, I don’t think you will be questioning Peters honesty or integrity.
There is no squirming out of it.
-
The whataboutery and poor attempts at deflection are utterly cringeworthy.
AJ over stepped the mark and has shown no remorse, let’s move to the vote.
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.
Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.
Personally, I think a works phone number is far more tangible and dangerous to be posted than a name, especially when it was followed up by a threat to use the number.
That's IF you even posted the name, and it sounds like you didn't.
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
So are we allowed to bring up stuff from other boards over the years? That should be fun
Perhaps if AJ admits it and apologises then we could stop short of having a vote. Seems fair to me, wouldn't you agree?
I think some of your posts defending your pals on here reeks of double standards Hardliner so perhaps look a wee bit closer to home on that one :)
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
Fanny is a right weird first name for a bloke. And the second one was made up.
Remember that when ACTUAL names were posted across the road Coyne found it funny (as well as sourcing my works phone number) and MoA did **** all. That's why I won't be taking their pant pishing seriously.
-
AJ puts up with a helluva lot of nonsense on here from the person in question, as well as double standards from other posters who only show outrage when it's the one way.
I know several details about AJ solely because people are on here spewing them regularly. Whether they were previously in the public domain or not still doesn't make that right to do IMO.
If AJ has indeed posted personal info, and I can see he denies this, then I'd like to see him given a bit of leeway given the wider context of the situation.
-
There can only be one outcome here
😂 Ye raging mate?
-
No defence or mitigation offered.
There will need to be a motion and vote on measures.
-
There can only be one outcome here
-
What does hinting at knowing private info about folk then posting their name actually achieve. Genuine question
Here he is.🙄
I'm not going over it all again. I said everything I needed to say and you proved my point.
This is a new board with a fresh start so I hope this doesn't set a precedent
Those first seven words are music to my ears.
Let's move on.
-
What does hinting at knowing private info about folk then posting their name actually achieve. Genuine question
Here he is.🙄
I'm not going over it all again. I said everything I needed to say and you proved my point.
This is a new board with a fresh start so I hope this doesn't set a precedent
-
What does hinting at knowing private info about folk then posting their name actually achieve. Genuine question
Here he is.🙄
-
What does hinting at knowing private info about folk then posting their name actually achieve. Genuine question
Imagine now trying to deny it 😂😂😂
You have seen it, so you can laugh at him ana.
-
It seems I've inadvertently touched a nerve.☹
-
What does hinting at knowing private info about folk then posting their name actually achieve. Genuine question
-
I did not post anybody's name.
You did AJ.
Do you have a defence or any mitigation?
I didn't post anybody's name. If I did, it was a coincidence.
Are you going to prattle on about this all day?
Showing yourself up for what you are, a shitebag 😂😂😂
-
I did not post anybody's name.
You did AJ.
Do you have a defence or any mitigation?
I didn't post anybody's name. If I did, it was a coincidence.
Are you going to prattle on about this all day?
-
I did not post anybody's name.
You did AJ.
Do you have a defence or any mitigation?
-
Share it on here then? What is there to hide?
-
I did not post anybody's name.
😂😂😂
Liar
I have the screenshot and it has been shared with Peter.
-
I did not post anybody's name.
-
Last night in my bed I had cause to delete a post by you in which you creepily and maliciously posted another poster’s name without their consent.
I am grieved by this as I always understood you to know how to dance along the line with wind ups without crossing it. I just don’t understand why you felt the need to cross that line. You give absolutely as good as you get and are not a victim here.
It will need to be a matter for the forum, but please state your defence.