EthicalScottishFitba

General Category => General Discussion => Topic started by: guest19 on November 30, 2020, 09:14:18 pm

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 02:13:33 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
We've seen your photos. Definitely a jumbo jet. ✈️

Bet your big massive wife fingered herself over my photos 😁😁😁.

Don’t worry, I have standards 👍
Coyne's baby mother lost 18st of ugly fat, when she binned him
😂😂😂👏 👏 👏
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 01:38:28 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
We've seen your photos. Definitely a jumbo jet. ✈️

Bet your big massive wife fingered herself over my photos 😁😁😁.

Don’t worry, I have standards 👍
Coyne's baby mother lost 18st of ugly fat, when she binned him

Which one 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Beardy23 on December 23, 2020, 01:36:46 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
We've seen your photos. Definitely a jumbo jet. ✈️

Bet your big massive wife fingered herself over my photos 😁😁😁.

Don’t worry, I have standards 👍
Coyne's baby mother lost 18st of ugly fat, when she binned him
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 01:11:14 pm
The only thing she would do is cry laughing. That pose and that blazer.😂


Do I have “your” word on that

(https://i.postimg.cc/gJTHJ9Cr/C45-A82-DB-C60-E-473-D-B351-3071-D2-B7-D399.png) (https://postimg.cc/DJ1XjNyK)

😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 01:07:29 pm
The only thing she would do is cry laughing. That pose and that blazer.😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 01:03:07 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
We've seen your photos. Definitely a jumbo jet. ✈️

Bet your big massive wife fingered herself over my photos 😁😁😁.

Don’t worry, I have standards 👍
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 01:00:35 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
We've seen your photos. Definitely a jumbo jet. ✈️
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest16 on December 23, 2020, 12:59:15 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Seriously wtf is wrong with you. How anyone can be so nasty, sick and weird beggars belief.
You need to have a long hard think about what you post and how it could upset people.
I once called you dad of the year and regretted it. Fu#k knows why but I still do.
I never, ever mention your family.

Shut up ya tit.
Fu#k you. Horrible, vile piece of sh#t.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 12:58:42 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

You should have followed her.

Well done to Mrs AJ though
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 12:57:50 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Seriously wtf is wrong with you. How anyone can be so nasty, sick and weird beggars belief.
You need to have a long hard think about what you post and how it could upset people.
I once called you dad of the year and regretted it. Fu#k knows why but I still do.
I never, ever mention your family.

Shut up ya tit.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 12:45:50 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Slimming World. She lost the weight and hasn't been for over four years. Silly Brenty.

Next.

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest16 on December 23, 2020, 12:43:43 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Seriously wtf is wrong with you. How anyone can be so nasty, sick and weird beggars belief.
You need to have a long hard think about what you post and how it could upset people.
I once called you dad of the year and regretted it. Fu#k knows why but I still do.
I never, ever mention your family.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 12:38:50 pm
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.

You not remember the post on Danny’s board, where you said she was on Scottish Slimmer due to her excess weight
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 11:43:44 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
I thought for a minute you were going to have a go at him for getting personal. 😂

PS. He has no idea about my wife. He's just lashing out with daft stuff today for some reason.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 23, 2020, 11:40:54 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️


You do know I like women that are big .
I've dated a load of them always fun to be with . There was one in particular who was about a size 22 she took 2 seats up on the bus she never sat downstairs because she struggled to get up.

I fell for her big time but she two timed me with my best mate and went off with him that took me a year to get over .

I've never had as much fun as I had with her .
I go for personality before looks and size always have .
Nothing wrong with being bigger built I think that in a woman is extremely attractive.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 11:29:10 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

She is mahoosive though
You're definitely upset today.😂

✈️

Just laughing at you, in your council house.

Anything else you leaving yer kids when you pop off?
Probably the £23k I made when I sold my house.😂

Next question. 🙂

😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 11:15:35 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

She is mahoosive though
You're definitely upset today.😂

✈️

Just laughing at you, in your council house.

Anything else you leaving yer kids when you pop off?
Probably the £23k I made when I sold my house.😂

Next question. 🙂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 10:57:20 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

She is mahoosive though
You're definitely upset today.😂

✈️

Just laughing at you, in your council house.

Anything else you leaving yer kids when you pop off?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 10:54:14 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

She is mahoosive though
You're definitely upset today.😂

✈️
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 10:27:46 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

She is mahoosive though
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 23, 2020, 09:35:11 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️

Coyne knows I find it distasteful when things like that are mentioned, I’ve said that to him myself, however I’ve better things to do than pull you two up every time you start getting personal, I’d be here all day so the pair of you can crack on.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 09:32:08 am
Brenty's went for the wife now. 😂

Cooheid and Buc will call you out for that. Honest.😂

✈️
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 09:29:36 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.

Read the first few words  then fell 💤

That makes sense.  I thought I felt tremors.
The big honey monster is definitely NOT light in his loafers.😃

😂😂😂

Do you and the wife still go to a weighbridge, rather than use scales like normal people

You shouldn’t reply, you have been rinsed left, right and centre recently 🤷‍♂️

😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 23, 2020, 09:25:49 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.
Exactly a bit of fun. And glad you have called out AJ there for taking things too seriously.

Was beginning to think you might be in the running for weak minded easily manipulated poster of the year. Good recovery mate :)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 23, 2020, 09:23:46 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.
Don’t listen to AJ, Hardliner. I think it’s a great award and one I’d love to see here next year.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 09:21:13 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.

Read the first few words  then fell 💤

That makes sense.  I thought I felt tremors.
The big honey monster is definitely NOT light in his loafers.😃
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 23, 2020, 09:20:01 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.

Read the first few words  then fell 💤

That makes sense.  I thought I felt tremors.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 23, 2020, 09:18:20 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.

Read the first few words  then fell 💤
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 23, 2020, 09:17:46 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.
The End.🙂👍
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 23, 2020, 09:15:20 am
I see WBOTY and WOTY are being questioned elsewhere on the board.

The unethical nature of last month's events led a lot of this board's key posters to review their posting home.  During that time, we started building the Righty forum again, capitalising on it's existing membership and strong ethical drawing power.  Since then, it has grown significantly.

I took it upon myself to create two polls for awards season as a bit of fun, based on posters on here.  I'd have included ourselves but we weren't posting here at the time.

It's a shame that people are bothered by it.  These things are just a bit of fun designed to spice up the posting experience IMO.  Some see it as an opportunity to gather their mates to round upon people to make them feel bad, but us righties are more like hearted about it all.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 22, 2020, 03:28:11 pm
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!

Sad to see but you got my POTY vote because you are a gentleman and deserve it

The only regular posters without a single vote for POTY are me and VOR  ;D

Maybe I can dish out some bribes in these last final days.
Just start being a boring tw@t and call everyone Mr and the votes will start coming your way.

 ;D :D ;D :D

9 days to go in WBOTY and WOTY!!

I feel recent posts may effect the WOTY poll.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 21, 2020, 11:52:30 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!

Sad to see but you got my POTY vote because you are a gentleman and deserve it

The only regular posters without a single vote for POTY are me and VOR  ;D

Maybe I can dish out some bribes in these last final days.
Just start being a boring tw@t and call everyone Mr and the votes will start coming your way.


That’s you just about there then, all you need to do now is start calling people Mr 👍


Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest16 on December 21, 2020, 11:19:48 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!

Sad to see but you got my POTY vote because you are a gentleman and deserve it

The only regular posters without a single vote for POTY are me and VOR  ;D

Maybe I can dish out some bribes in these last final days.
Just start being a boring tw@t and call everyone Mr and the votes will start coming your way.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 21, 2020, 11:14:04 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!

Sad to see but you got my POTY vote because you are a gentleman and deserve it

The only regular posters without a single vote for POTY are me and VOR  ;D

Maybe I can dish out some bribes in these last final days.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 21, 2020, 11:11:34 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!

Sad to see but you got my POTY vote because you are a gentleman and deserve it
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 09:27:42 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
WBOTY thread on here has had over 1000 views.

Very keen to secure the franchise for this board for next year and I’m sure the talks will go well. Will definitely beat any offer from BJ.

Sorry Pete, I actually meant to get back to your voice message regarding this.

Maybe start talks after the new year?

Yeah, we’ll get something in the calendar  and see if we can synergise to give this cracking piece of IP the home where it can truly thrive.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 21, 2020, 09:23:09 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
WBOTY thread on here has had over 1000 views.

Very keen to secure the franchise for this board for next year and I’m sure the talks will go well. Will definitely beat any offer from BJ.

Sorry Pete, I actually meant to get back to your voice message regarding this.

Maybe start talks after the new year?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 21, 2020, 09:17:12 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
It's absolutely wonderful. 😂

I've come to the conclusion that Brenty and Mrs Timbo actually fancy you Brother.

The flirting is beyond belief.
I wouldn't go near a woman like Mrs Timbo, brother. She is not very ladylike at all.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 09:04:31 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
WBOTY thread on here has had over 1000 views.

Very keen to secure the franchise for this board for next year and I’m sure the talks will go well. Will definitely beat any offer from BJ.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 21, 2020, 08:48:45 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
It's absolutely wonderful. 😂

I've come to the conclusion that Brenty and Mrs Timbo actually fancy you Brother.

The flirting is beyond belief.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 21, 2020, 08:45:21 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
It's absolutely wonderful. 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 21, 2020, 08:44:32 am
Mr Mo and Mr AJ were getting all the abuse for a while there.

Glad it's now being flung in a more general righty direction, it stops Mr Panty from feeling left out.

Lovely to see the WBOTY/WOTY awards garnering so much attention  ;D
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 21, 2020, 08:40:49 am
I remember mr ralph having a bee in his bonnet with whatever you posted on the other board mr grant. Sometimes any random thing will annoy people it could be something as simple as calling people mr and it could have some posters frothing at the mouth!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 08:37:10 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!
The hard on they have for you is really quite remarkable. And now they they are trying to legitimise that by recasting you as a woman in their imagination. Conflicted people.

The only similar experience I’ve had was with Mr Ralph earlier this year for a time. I honestly thought he wanted to boaby me at one point. 😮
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 21, 2020, 08:27:38 am
It's very odd mr grant. I think some might have personal issues going on in their lives and being abusive on here is maybe a way of letting off some steam. Just my amateur psychologist two bobs worth!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 21, 2020, 08:11:41 am
Proud to even be nominated on a board I don't post on. Fingers crossed.
I’ve never known a poster to be so under the skin of the righties, Mr Rambo.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 21, 2020, 08:04:36 am
Proud to even be nominated on a board I don't post on. Fingers crossed.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 20, 2020, 06:23:02 pm
I am disappointed not to be getting some kind of award for my guerilla style screenshot endeavour.

Amazon are all out of plasticine  :(
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 20, 2020, 06:18:53 pm
I am disappointed not to be getting some kind of award for my guerilla style screenshot endeavour.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 20, 2020, 05:45:33 pm
The winner will receive an online cyberaward.

The ceremonial golden binoculars.

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61MWAnZ1daL._AC_SY355_.jpg)

Nice, hope I win them. Make it easier to look at the neighbours
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 20, 2020, 05:39:22 pm
The winner will receive an online cyberaward.

The ceremonial golden binoculars.

(https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/I/61MWAnZ1daL._AC_SY355_.jpg)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 20, 2020, 05:27:32 pm
As promised, please see below for the latest polling figures for WBOTY and WOTY:

(https://i.ibb.co/Fgrs2tq/WBOTY-WOTY.jpg)

There's been a bit of vote swapping in the last few days, as well as an additional voter entering the fray.

Fremsley's previously long established WBOTY leader position is now being challenged with Mrs Timbo breathing down his neck, knitting needle in hand.  It's hard to know who'll finish up the winner.  Fremsley looked to be running away with it and has always been known as the original Wet Blanket, however it's been noticed that Mrs Timbo hasn't managed to keep up her polite gimmick of late, sometimes resorting to anger and throwing insults.  This as well as her general blandness has lead some to think that she may be WBOTY 2020 material.

WOTY records show Cooheid originally being off to a flyer, being seen as a front runner, hot of the back of an indecent comment about a lady in her 80's, however there is a general feel that Coyne has had the infamous doxxing of Noah as well as making incredibly weird comments on a consistent basis.  Mrs Timbo has again shown herself to be a bit of a dark horse on this one galloping up the side from a previously low position.  Discussions don't regard her as creepy in the classic sense, but weird in terms of lack of self-awareness and making things up.  It's hard to say how this 3 horse race will end up.  I can't see Pete catching these guys but only time will tell.

If anyone would like to provide odds then feel free.

Do I get a medal or a trophy if I win 😁

I’m excited.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 20, 2020, 05:26:41 pm
Not surprising with it being a yoondum board to be fair . ::)

Just have to go with it because the people have voted.

As we voted in 2014.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 20, 2020, 02:59:48 pm
Not surprising with it being a yoondum board to be fair . ::)

Just have to go with it because the people have voted.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 20, 2020, 02:58:39 pm
Who voted for me in the creep one? I'd like to thank them 😀

There's a couple of newly registered posters who are just going by discussions within the board as well as what they read on here.  It might have been one of them mate.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 20, 2020, 02:46:14 pm
Who voted for me in the creep one? I'd like to thank them 😀
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 20, 2020, 02:18:14 pm
As promised, please see below for the latest polling figures for WBOTY and WOTY:

(https://i.ibb.co/Fgrs2tq/WBOTY-WOTY.jpg)

There's been a bit of vote swapping in the last few days, as well as an additional voter entering the fray.

Fremsley's previously long established WBOTY leader position is now being challenged with Mrs Timbo breathing down his neck, knitting needle in hand.  It's hard to know who'll finish up the winner.  Fremsley looked to be running away with it and has always been known as the original Wet Blanket, however it's been noticed that Mrs Timbo hasn't managed to keep up her polite gimmick of late, sometimes resorting to anger and throwing insults.  This as well as her general blandness has lead some to think that she may be WBOTY 2020 material.

WOTY records show Cooheid originally being off to a flyer, being seen as a front runner, hot of the back of an indecent comment about a lady in her 80's, however there is a general feel that Coyne has had the infamous doxxing of Noah as well as making incredibly weird comments on a consistent basis.  Mrs Timbo has again shown herself to be a bit of a dark horse on this one galloping up the side from a previously low position.  Discussions don't regard her as creepy in the classic sense, but weird in terms of lack of self-awareness and making things up.  It's hard to say how this 3 horse race will end up.  I can't see Pete catching these guys but only time will tell.

If anyone would like to provide odds then feel free.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 20, 2020, 09:57:30 am
There's been movement on both the WBOTY and WOTY polls.  Votes have changed and an additional voter has entered the fray, changing the leaders of both polls.

Expect a screenshot early afternoon.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 20, 2020, 12:56:48 am
I live with my kids and see them every morning and every night. 😎

No access required. 🙂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 19, 2020, 09:51:17 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D

There is no feud.

His jealousy about others that better themselves is his issue.

If he put more energy into his own personal life, than he did on here.

He might not be living in a council house, whilst poorly attempting to be a smart arse on forums.

Thems the breaks eh 👍
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 19, 2020, 09:38:19 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D

Messageboard - The Musical!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 09:29:26 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.

I just remember you saying you were wrong on two counts or something.  If I am shown to be wrong then I'll eat humble pie.  Anyway, I'm just saying my line of thinking was probably the reason for the ban rather than it just being for no reason.

Very true about us being complex creatures.

I can't really make moral judgements on the feud between AJ and Coyne, it sounds like it is very deep and goes back a long way with several incidents having taken place on different boards with resentment having been built up over time.  People will often react to such incidents in a faction-driven manner rather than being consistent, which will lead to more resentment and a willingness to get back at not just one person but their 'collaborators' too... this will also lead to actions previously regarded as OTT to be regarded as fair play in a specific situation.

Anyway, I suppose we all need to take a step back and breathe once in a while :)

You could actually write a book or make a documentary with all the drama on boards over the years  ;D
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 19, 2020, 09:13:49 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.

I did say specifically, publicly what the errors were, more than once. And nobody knows this until now except for AJ, but I did also give him a personal apology in a personal message to which he has never responded.

I did not apologise for his ban, because that was a community decision. I apologised for the procedural errors made by me on the day and assured him they were not born of malice or any kind of ill will.

I don’t tend to see posters in black and white, we are all complex creatures. He did act in a creepy way and crossed a line, but what drove that I do not know.

I like AJ, but he DOES have a victim complex, does not strive to meet the standards he sets for others, and can be manipulative.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 19, 2020, 09:08:10 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

(https://i.postimg.cc/P5g7dMYH/DD6-C67-F6-E9-E0-4163-920-A-B9-CCFA366-EC3.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.

There's been a bit of movement in that regard Cooheid.  All will be revealed tomorrow.

Nice Alan Partridge gif - I'm a fan!  My Brother in law and his wife have got me an Alan Partridge themed gift for Christmas and I'm wondering what it is.

This was ma Valentine’s Day card to the wife last year.

(https://i.postimg.cc/FKWz3zdc/19-B7714-C-837-B-46-FC-8216-71-B4260-FE3-FD.jpg) (https://postimg.cc/mc9TGbS2)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 09:00:08 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

Mmmh.

My personal opinion is that the matter 4 weeks ago was dealt with wrongly and that one particular poster who also doxxed someone was never given a ticking off, never mind punished.  A board poll regarding automatic ban was also ignored in this regard.  Now, I know you admitted to errors on 2 counts (although I don't think you specifically named what they were) but it's hardly the same as saying to AJ 'I was wrong for X or Y reasons, sorry mate'.  This isn't something I hold against you, but it may be what has lead AJ to ban you?  I'm not sure as I can't speak for him.

I believe these are the events which lead to the subsequent creations of your nicknames of 'TUC' as well as 'Plasticine Pete'

Not really my battle but just giving my take on how I think events have panned out.

Personally, I'd love this board, the Righty board (including orange and masonic sub forums) and Faniels board to merge into one, with you, AJ and Faniel being the moderators.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest16 on December 19, 2020, 08:55:32 pm
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂

There are no weak minded folks within our faction.

We are all highly ethical, free-thinkers of high moral fibre.
Exactly, none of us are brainwashed by the cult 😁🇬🇧
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 08:52:13 pm
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂

There are no weak minded folks within our faction.

We are all highly ethical, free-thinkers of high moral fibre.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest16 on December 19, 2020, 08:51:31 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.
The screenshots was an unethical act.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 08:50:41 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

(https://i.postimg.cc/P5g7dMYH/DD6-C67-F6-E9-E0-4163-920-A-B9-CCFA366-EC3.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.

There's been a bit of movement in that regard Cooheid.  All will be revealed tomorrow.

Nice Alan Partridge gif - I'm a fan!  My Brother in law and his wife have got me an Alan Partridge themed gift for Christmas and I'm wondering what it is.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 19, 2020, 08:49:48 pm
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?

No, let AJ run his forum.

Whilst appointing the weak minded to join his clique 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 19, 2020, 08:47:07 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.

(https://i.postimg.cc/P5g7dMYH/DD6-C67-F6-E9-E0-4163-920-A-B9-CCFA366-EC3.gif) (https://postimages.org/)

I’m still waiting for confirmation that I’ve won creeper of the year.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 19, 2020, 08:43:59 pm
I was a member for some years and posted on it in good faith but it did me no favours. I was banned from it for no reason.

On the matter of screenshots, that is a legitimate act when dealing with bad faith actors, and one that is easily negated by not hiding the forum in the first place.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 08:39:49 pm
Here's a question:

Would any non-Righty posters wish to become members of The Righty Forum and post on it in good faith?  I.e. get involved with discussions and not just take screenshots, report back etc?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 19, 2020, 07:08:02 pm
I'm the nicest guy on here
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 06:09:37 pm
There's been some movement on both the Wet Blanket and Weirdo polls today.

I'll post a new screenshot tomorrow.

It's getting interesting now mate .

Hurry up and let us know I'm a right nosey so n so.!!!!

Will do mate.

The righty forum is buzzing at the moment.  I think awards season has given it the spark it needed.


Is it an all righty board mason shake hands type of thing .
Or can Catholics ( not practicing as yet) like me be made welcome .?

As far as I'm aware there's not an anti-Catholic policy Buc.

There are free masons and Orangemen on it but we have our own private sub forums where virtual hand shaking and the rolling up of trouser legs takes place.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 19, 2020, 06:03:28 pm
There's been some movement on both the Wet Blanket and Weirdo polls today.

I'll post a new screenshot tomorrow.

It's getting interesting now mate .

Hurry up and let us know I'm a right nosey so n so.!!!!

Will do mate.

The righty forum is buzzing at the moment.  I think awards season has given it the spark it needed.


Is it an all righty board mason shake hands type of thing .
Or can Catholics ( not practicing as yet) like me be made welcome .?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 19, 2020, 05:58:57 pm
The righties are still very shy though, with their hidden board and not letting normies on. AJ pouring over ip addresses is ridiculous. 😆
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 05:43:57 pm
There's been some movement on both the Wet Blanket and Weirdo polls today.

I'll post a new screenshot tomorrow.

It's getting interesting now mate .

Hurry up and let us know I'm a right nosey so n so.!!!!

Will do mate.

The righty forum is buzzing at the moment.  I think awards season has given it the spark it needed.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 19, 2020, 03:50:27 pm
There's been some movement on both the Wet Blanket and Weirdo polls today.

I'll post a new screenshot tomorrow.

It's getting interesting now mate .

Hurry up and let us know I'm a right nosey so n so.!!!!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 19, 2020, 03:44:28 pm
There's been some movement on both the Wet Blanket and Weirdo polls today.

I'll post a new screenshot tomorrow.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 18, 2020, 09:33:08 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour

How long have you been called a Wet Blanket for mate?  Just so I can accurately update the history section of the award.
Never in real life. AJ has called me spineless and a shitebag but wet blanket was only on here.

The figure of ridicule 😁

Been quiet tonight on his own anniversary 🤷‍♂️
I was hoping he would give us a speech

Ah that would be lovely.

Be better if it was on the podcast, but he’s nae bottle.

A spineless, shitebag some would say 😉
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 09:29:07 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour

How long have you been called a Wet Blanket for mate?  Just so I can accurately update the history section of the award.
Never in real life. AJ has called me spineless and a shitebag but wet blanket was only on here.

The figure of ridicule 😁

Been quiet tonight on his own anniversary 🤷‍♂️
I was hoping he would give us a speech
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 18, 2020, 09:27:31 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour

How long have you been called a Wet Blanket for mate?  Just so I can accurately update the history section of the award.
Never in real life. AJ has called me spineless and a shitebag but wet blanket was only on here.

The figure of ridicule 😁

Been quiet tonight on his own anniversary 🤷‍♂️
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 08:58:24 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour

How long have you been called a Wet Blanket for mate?  Just so I can accurately update the history section of the award.
Never in real life. AJ has called me spineless and a shitebag but wet blanket was only on here.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 18, 2020, 07:07:35 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour

How long have you been called a Wet Blanket for mate?  Just so I can accurately update the history section of the award.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 01:46:06 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?

I thought it a fairly straight forward explanation.
I thought AJ had been given names again and you realised I worked for you. I've been holding in my belly since you made a comment about it.  :-[


I'm easily taken in do you guys know eachother.?
Best mates
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 01:44:15 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?

I thought it a fairly straight forward explanation.
I thought AJ had been given names again and you realised I worked for you. I've been holding in my belly since you made a comment about it.  :-[


I'm easily taken in do you guys know eachother.?

I wouldn’t lower myself.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 18, 2020, 01:42:59 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?

I thought it a fairly straight forward explanation.
I thought AJ had been given names again and you realised I worked for you. I've been holding in my belly since you made a comment about it.  :-[


I'm easily taken in do you guys know eachother.?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 01:38:26 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?

I thought it a fairly straight forward explanation.
I thought AJ had been given names again and you realised I worked for you. I've been holding in my belly since you made a comment about it.  :-[

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 01:27:32 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?

I thought it a fairly straight forward explanation.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 01:27:12 pm
Sorry misread that there

I'd be happy for the award to be named in my honour
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 01:24:54 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
You what?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 01:14:32 pm
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.

Got to ask are you in athletic shape ?
Or do you have an obvious gut .? Don't get high I'm only asking .

I’m a bronzed Adonis.


Thank you for replying in the proper manner I really appreciate that .

You must go to the gym then fair play to you on keeping fit .

Some are just a natural.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 18, 2020, 12:57:54 pm
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.

Got to ask are you in athletic shape ?
Or do you have an obvious gut .? Don't get high I'm only asking .

I’m a bronzed Adonis.


Thank you for replying in the proper manner I really appreciate that .

You must go to the gym then fair play to you on keeping fit .
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 12:22:25 pm
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.

‘The poster formerly known as Fremsley’
Works for me.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 12:21:17 pm
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.

Got to ask are you in athletic shape ?
Or do you have an obvious gut .? Don't get high I'm only asking .

I’m a bronzed Adonis.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 18, 2020, 11:46:31 am
Keep us updated, spiersy.

Will do Dennis.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 18, 2020, 11:29:56 am
Keep us updated, spiersy.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 18, 2020, 11:28:26 am
We are trying to come up with a firm and specific definition of the term 'Wet Blanket'

If anyone has any ideas, then I'll take them back to the committee to assess.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 09:32:49 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.
Have you been spying on me?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 18, 2020, 09:18:02 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.

Got to ask are you in athletic shape ?
Or do you have an obvious gut .? Don't get high I'm only asking .
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 09:05:53 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D

It’s as obvious as your gut.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 08:58:50 am
I like to treat people the way they treat me and my faction[/

You won't find a more clam laid back guy than me though  :D

Same here mate.

I think we'd get on well.
Of course mate :)

It's part of the game that the righties and lefties will back each other up mate. You have said as much. I just wish the Angry one could realise it and stop moaning about how unfair everything is

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 18, 2020, 08:51:18 am
I like to treat people the way they treat me and my faction :)

You won't find a more clam laid back guy than me though  :D

Same here mate.  Being so laid back is one of the reasons I don't live near you anymore.

I think we'd get on well.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 08:49:31 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
I doubt you could if you tried  ;D
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 08:48:46 am
I like to treat people the way they treat me :)

You won't find a more clam laid back guy than me though  :D
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 18, 2020, 08:25:36 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
Brenty and Timsley were in an awfy state last night. ☹

They are lovely and friendly on the voice chat, but seem to lash out all over the place on here.

I wish they didn't feel the need to put on a front on the main board.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 18, 2020, 08:18:21 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
Brenty and Timsley were in an awfy state last night. ☹
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 08:16:28 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

I seem to have touched a nerve.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 18, 2020, 08:11:17 am
VOR pished the bed again I see

😂

At his age, he will be up a few times through the night.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 18, 2020, 08:07:04 am
VOR pished the bed again I see
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 18, 2020, 03:47:38 am
Still waiting on Fremsley's debut..

He sounds like a camp Kenneth Williams so I think we’ll spot him.
Nothing the matter with being feminine


....if yer a female.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 17, 2020, 10:08:22 pm
Still waiting on Fremsley's debut..

He sounds like a camp Kenneth Williams so I think we’ll spot him.
Nothing the matter with being feminine
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 17, 2020, 10:05:25 pm
Still waiting on Fremsley's debut..

He sounds like a camp Kenneth Williams so I think we’ll spot him.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 17, 2020, 10:04:10 pm
Still waiting on Fremsley's debut..
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 17, 2020, 07:51:33 am
I'm away to ramp up my WOTY campaign and possibly send sick pics to the righties

Go for it mate.

Hope to see you involved in the audio chat tomorrow too.
I'm having some voice issues just now. When I'm back at peak I'll give it a bash

Good man
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 11:08:09 pm
I'm away to ramp up my WOTY campaign and possibly send sick pics to the righties

Go for it mate.

Hope to see you involved in the audio chat tomorrow too.
I'm having some voice issues just now. When I'm back at peak I'll give it a bash
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 11:05:06 pm
I'm away to ramp up my WOTY campaign and possibly send sick pics to the righties

Go for it mate.

Hope to see you involved in the audio chat tomorrow too.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 11:02:59 pm
I'm away to ramp up my WOTY campaign and possibly send sick pics to the righties
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 10:59:30 pm
I did okay in the wet blanket award. Not so well in the creepy one. 😕

Still a few weeks to go Erchie.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on December 16, 2020, 10:53:30 pm
I did okay in the wet blanket award. Not so well in the creepy one. 😕
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 05:45:39 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?

I'm sure you'll be able to read the discussion and see Peter 😜
just looking to see if you guys can do ethics and transparency off your own backs. 🙂

I can't speak for anyone else, but I always try my upmost to be ethical in all my interactions in life.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 16, 2020, 04:48:17 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?

I'm sure you'll be able to read the discussion and see Peter 😜
just looking to see if you guys can do ethics and transparency off your own backs. 🙂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 16, 2020, 04:45:16 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?

I'm sure you'll be able to read the discussion and see Peter 😜
Boom 💥 😂

😂😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 16, 2020, 04:43:24 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?

I'm sure you'll be able to read the discussion and see Peter 😜
Boom 💥 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 04:28:33 pm
It was Eaststand Elite
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Beardy23 on December 16, 2020, 04:26:55 pm
Noah clue
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 04:26:22 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?

I'm sure you'll be able to read the discussion and see Peter 😜
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 16, 2020, 04:17:11 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Who was it?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 16, 2020, 04:12:10 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
I genuinely didn't even think of you. We know who it was.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 16, 2020, 03:50:15 pm
It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.  One poster was even described as a 'Saturated Blanket' rather than just Wet.

Votes took place with regards to requests from two additional unregistered posters to be allowed to vote, but after an anonymous committee vote they were turned down.  There was much debate before the vote, even with talk of caveats if certain things were apologised for or posts taken back etc the the final votes were not unanimous.

I won't embarrass the requesters and say who they were.  It wouldn't be ethical.
I do hope there aren’t any screenshots of those debates kicking around. 🙂

That would make a nice Christmas gift for the board mr grant!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 03:49:42 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing

Personally, I don't think it was you.

I don't think the rest of the committee do either.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 03:46:32 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
That wasn't me. The only time I tried to look in was when you returned and nobody told me I was banned :) I see now you have not only banned me but deleted my account :) During the whole boycott I had no interest in viewing
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 16, 2020, 03:40:32 pm
It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.  One poster was even described as a 'Saturated Blanket' rather than just Wet.

Votes took place with regards to requests from two additional unregistered posters to be allowed to vote, but after an anonymous committee vote they were turned down.  There was much debate before the vote, even with talk of caveats if certain things were apologised for or posts taken back etc the the final votes were not unanimous.

I won't embarrass the requesters and say who they were.  It wouldn't be ethical.
I do hope there aren’t any screenshots of those debates kicking around. 🙂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 16, 2020, 03:23:29 pm
It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.  One poster was even described as a 'Saturated Blanket' rather than just Wet.

Votes took place with regards to requests from two additional unregistered posters to be allowed to vote, but after an anonymous committee vote they were turned down.  There was much debate before the vote, even with talk of caveats if certain things were apologised for or posts taken back etc the the final votes were not unanimous.

I won't embarrass the requesters and say who they were.  It wouldn't be ethical.

This board stopped being ethical a week or so ago.
20th of November to be exact.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 16, 2020, 03:22:47 pm
Somebody registering as "VoiceofReason" with a Dundee IP address almost had us fooled. 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest17 on December 16, 2020, 03:21:47 pm
It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.  One poster was even described as a 'Saturated Blanket' rather than just Wet.

Votes took place with regards to requests from two additional unregistered posters to be allowed to vote, but after an anonymous committee vote they were turned down.  There was much debate before the vote, even with talk of caveats if certain things were apologised for or posts taken back etc the the final votes were not unanimous.

I won't embarrass the requesters and say who they were.  It wouldn't be ethical.

This board stopped being ethical a week or so ago.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 03:19:29 pm
It'll be interesting to see how it pans out.  One poster was even described as a 'Saturated Blanket' rather than just Wet.

Votes took place with regards to requests from two additional unregistered posters to be allowed to vote, but after an anonymous committee vote they were turned down.  There was much debate before the vote, even with talk of caveats if certain things were apologised for or posts taken back etc the the final votes were not unanimous.

I won't embarrass the requesters and say who they were.  It wouldn't be ethical.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 16, 2020, 02:48:37 pm
2nd and 3rd. I must double my efforts immediately!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 02:48:29 pm
I fear winning the double may be a hurdle too many.
I'd love the weird award if i'm honest

I prefer broad minded myself.
You reckon some ginger benefit cheat used his votes up on us :) :)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 16, 2020, 02:44:03 pm
I fear winning the double may be a hurdle too many.
I'd love the weird award if i'm honest

I prefer broad minded myself.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 02:42:52 pm
I fear winning the double may be a hurdle too many.
I'd love the weird award if i'm honest
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 16, 2020, 02:41:54 pm
I fear winning the double may be a hurdle too many.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 16, 2020, 02:40:27 pm
Excellent :)

Good to see Ralph posting over there plus 2 others :)

It must have been booming
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 16, 2020, 02:34:42 pm
As requested, please see below for the latest polling with regards to WBOTY and of course WOTY.

The polls were created when the Righties weren't posting, hence their exclusion.

The driver behind creating a WOTY poll was a noticeable spike in weird posts, especially one regarding a woman in her 80's doing something that I'd rather not repeat.

New members to the board have been reading posts on here to get an idea of what they're voting for.  It's possible we might have additional votes between now and 31st December, as well as votes changing depending on poster behaviour.

(https://i.ibb.co/VgY44wB/WOTY-WBOTY.jpg)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 05, 2020, 06:21:59 am
It's fitting to see Timsley currently leading the poll given the term was first coined within our circles to describe him.
I'll take whatever award I get in good heart. Getting wound up about whoever wins a poll on the internet tends to stay with you in my view  ;)

So I see you are all coming back with your tail between your legs after failing to get the public apology from Peter :)

I'm the same, RDN.  It's all for the bantz.

In the spirit of rapprochement we get the poll for this going and stickied, Hardliner.

Thanks for the offer but it has to be kept where it is.  Some who have already voted don't post here.

Awards season has really brought the AG board alive!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 04, 2020, 11:48:01 am
It's fitting to see Timsley currently leading the poll given the term was first coined within our circles to describe him.
I'll take whatever award I get in good heart. Getting wound up about whoever wins a poll on the internet tends to stay with you in my view  ;)

So I see you are all coming back with your tail between your legs after failing to get the public apology from Peter :)

I'm the same, RDN.  It's all for the bantz.

In the spirit of rapprochement we get the poll for this going and stickied, Hardliner.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 04, 2020, 11:47:05 am
It's fitting to see Timsley currently leading the poll given the term was first coined within our circles to describe him.
I'll take whatever award I get in good heart. Getting wound up about whoever wins a poll on the internet tends to stay with you in my view  ;)

So I see you are all coming back with your tail between your legs after failing to get the public apology from Peter :)

I'm the same, RDN.  It's all for the bantz.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest3 on December 04, 2020, 11:18:40 am
Pete has shown himself to be a coward and the complete opposite of ethical, and deep down he knows it, but he'll never admit it. That's good enough for me.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 04, 2020, 11:06:45 am
It's fitting to see Timsley currently leading the poll given the term was first coined within our circles to describe him.
I'll take whatever award I get in good heart. Getting wound up about whoever wins a poll on the internet tends to stay with you in my view  ;)

So I see you are all coming back with your tail between your legs after failing to get the public apology from Peter :)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 04, 2020, 10:51:24 am
It's fitting to see Timsley currently leading the poll given the term was first coined within our circles to describe him.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 04, 2020, 09:48:24 am
Been posting on boards for over 10 years I suppose I've raised my voice now and again .
Part of life.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 03, 2020, 10:31:28 pm
He literally has 😂😂😂
You don’t post in a normal way. Away with the fairies.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 10:28:13 pm
He literally has 😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 03, 2020, 09:35:53 pm
Yes; yes he has.

And omg, did you like actually use the word literally when there was zero need for it? 😂😂😂

He hasn’t.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 08:47:13 pm
Yes; yes he has.

And omg, did you like actually use the word literally when there was zero need for it? 😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 03, 2020, 08:08:31 pm
Och Buc''s just a cuddly snat. Til he turns nasty ☹️
He has literally never “turned nasty”.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 07:55:31 pm
Och Buc''s just a cuddly snat. Til he turns nasty ☹️
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 03, 2020, 07:49:11 pm
Hopefully I win because I get it for being a proud and passionate Scot .

Be like getting an Oscar for me .
I think Deemo VOR and even my auld pal AJ sadly don't
Ike this .

They think you’re worth the watching. 
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Buc on December 03, 2020, 07:08:15 pm
Hopefully I win because I get it for being a proud and passionate Scot .

Be like getting an Oscar for me .
I think Deemo VOR and even my auld pal AJ sadly don't
Ike this .
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 03, 2020, 06:47:49 pm
Fuckin wish it was yours.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 06:39:05 pm
Is that your final post on the matter? 😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 05:14:07 pm
Not at all mr theboy and I'll definitely use it again in future. Try and refrain from throwing your toys out the pram when that happens.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 05:01:23 pm
It don't annoy me at all but it's lovely how you never use it anymore after it being over used in your direction. It's obvious its like losing an arm, or bra, to you.

And that 😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 04:54:31 pm
That one really annoys you for some reason mr thebhoy.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 04:29:24 pm
Is that your final post on the matter Mrs Timbo? 😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 04:08:28 pm
Yes I've noticed this as well mr fremsley. I remember he had similar strange behaviour towards mr coyne where he seemed fixated on him a month or two ago. He will probably move onto someone else soon. It's a bit like that card game scabby queen/old maid where you had to try and pass it onto someone else!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 03, 2020, 03:47:46 pm
Not at the moment mr thebhoy I'm busy doing some knitting.
Are you prepared for Hardliner's daily evening appearance under orders, Mr Rambo. I think that must be when he has his coffee and icing sugar as he is very excitable. I only mention this as you seem to be the prime target
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 03:37:07 pm
Not at the moment mr thebhoy I'm busy doing some knitting.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 03:34:52 pm
No mr thebhoy. Read my post again if you're struggling.

Wot, no smart arsed reply? 😂😂😂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 03:26:34 pm
No mr thebhoy. Read my post again if you're struggling.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest7 on December 03, 2020, 03:18:00 pm
Choked on Coynes man glue you mean Mrs Timbo?
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 03, 2020, 03:08:36 pm
Nearly choked drinking my tea there when I saw that mr coyne!
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 03, 2020, 09:34:17 am
Here’s Hardliner, AJ and DaftMo waiting on the votes coming through....

(https://i.postimg.cc/VkyLtLk3/5-E078-D22-B07-A-40-D1-8-DA6-000794-E5-BDA3.jpg) (https://postimages.org/)


Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Cooheid on December 03, 2020, 09:31:46 am
I’ve sent a pm to hardliner with my vote, if it gets through security of course.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 10:22:31 pm
Hardliner are you on the spectrum? If so I'll happily lay off you

It's been an entertaining day, (insert righty-dictated name here).

You guys have tried hard, i'll give you that.  10/10 for effort but 0/10 for success.

**chuckles**
OK mate if that is your happy place I'm good to go along with that.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 09:52:38 pm
Hardliner are you on the spectrum? If so I'll happily lay off you

It's been an entertaining day, (insert righty-dictated name here).

You guys have tried hard, i'll give you that.  10/10 for effort but 0/10 for success.

**chuckles**
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 09:39:00 pm
Hardliner are you on the spectrum? If so I'll happily lay off you
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 09:20:17 pm
Just wondering, Comrade Hardliner, did JTC receive more or fewer votes overall than Fremsley and Buc? 😀

JTC might have a vote but the panel have yet to finish their assessment of the person trying to vote for him.

In any case, he is way behind Timsley and Buc.

9 individuals have voted so far with more still to come in, and there'll be plenty more chopping and changing!!

There has been a real awakening on the Ethical Board Continuing.
I suspect JTC might have received more than one vote. 🙂

He doesn't have any confirmed votes at all.  Your request to be allowed a vote is still being assessed and no one else has gone through the proper channels.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 09:12:32 pm
Just wondering, Comrade Hardliner, did JTC receive more or fewer votes overall than Fremsley and Buc? 😀

JTC might have a vote but the panel have yet to finish their assessment of the person trying to vote for him.

In any case, he is way behind Timsley and Buc.

9 individuals have voted so far with more still to come in, and there'll be plenty more chopping and changing!!

There has been a real awakening on the Ethical Board Continuing.
I suspect JTC might have received more than one vote. 🙂
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 08:52:35 pm
Excellent. I was hoping for the roaster award but this will do 😀

Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 08:49:49 pm
Just wondering, Comrade Hardliner, did JTC receive more or fewer votes overall than Fremsley and Buc? 😀

JTC might have a vote but the panel have yet to finish their assessment of the person trying to vote for him.

In any case, he is way behind Timsley and Buc.

9 individuals have voted so far with more still to come in, and there'll be plenty more chopping and changing!!

There has been a real awakening on the Ethical Board Continuing.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 08:45:30 pm
Wonderful news. I hope I end up with all 4 votes 😀
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 08:39:22 pm
Just wondering, Comrade Hardliner, did JTC receive more or fewer votes overall than Fremsley and Buc? 😀
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 02, 2020, 08:19:09 pm
Deary me.

Young Hardliner trying to impress the CC after being groomed.

Tragic stuff
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 08:15:06 pm
2 days in to WBOTY and votes have been changed several times by several people, leaving Buc and Timsley currently tied in 1st position.  I'm actually rather surprised.  Still, I wouldn't worry too much.. you've got 29 days to add some bite and excitement to your posts and avoid established wet blanket status.

It's all to play for.

(https://archive.ceylontoday.lk/site-api/uploads/FeatureHeader/5daaadf014dd6_12.jpg)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 02, 2020, 07:34:12 pm
I think young Hardliner had a few sherries today.

I was wondering if that might be the case mr coyne. As I say he seems an odd little chap but harmless.

Very odd.

Like one of the kids at school that thought they should get in the football team or hang around the cool kids, never happened.

Young Hardliner might be being groomed from the CC
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 07:32:50 pm
Keep dancin'

(https://media1.tenor.com/images/a99da63536c19a8fe2b802c7906a4f32/tenor.gif?itemid=11348861)
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: mrs timbo on December 02, 2020, 07:18:45 pm
I think young Hardliner had a few sherries today.

I was wondering if that might be the case mr coyne. As I say he seems an odd little chap but harmless.
Title: Re: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 02, 2020, 07:06:42 pm
I think young Hardliner had a few sherries today.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on December 02, 2020, 03:44:54 pm
They just can't handle Mr Rambo
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 03:36:08 pm
If the board was private the tummy tickle posts would fizzle out i'd imagine

Just saying :)
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 03:32:27 pm
Mr panty seems incredibly keen to impress his chums on the other board for a pat on the head as it were. I'm sure he's a decent chap in real life but his recent posts have been pretty cringey to say the least. Hopefully in the new year we'll see some improvement.

I suggest you put down the knitting needle and go out for some fresh air, Mrs Timbo.  You seem awfy agitated today.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: mrs timbo on December 02, 2020, 03:08:03 pm
Mr panty seems incredibly keen to impress his chums on the other board for a pat on the head as it were. I'm sure he's a decent chap in real life but his recent posts have been pretty cringey to say the least. Hopefully in the new year we'll see some improvement.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 02:21:43 pm
Hardliner is liked and respected by all here, and it is sad to see him in AJ’s clutches.

My admission of process errors on Friday 21st that were unfair to AJ and his subsequent early unbanning should be enough for everyone.

I have no issue with displaying humility but I won’t be bullied, by AJ nor by anyone, especially when AJ is running scared of open debate and is manipulating people.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 02:16:13 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???

What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see

I'm absolutely fine, mate.  How are you keeping?

Many thanks for the suggestion.
I'm good mate thanks

Hope to see you back on here posting and debating again soon

This board is open for anyone to post and join and anyone who doesn't it's their own choice. Anything else is a bit ridiculous really

I'd love to be back posting proper. 

Sometimes I try to type a new topic, but my fingers automatically recoil and I get flashbacks of what has happened and thoughts of how there has been no apology.

It's like I have extreme high moral fibre contained within every blood cell.

It's all in Pete's hands.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: mrs timbo on December 02, 2020, 02:08:58 pm
Has he made the announcement yet? It’s just been word salad so far.

Mr panty's announcements seem to get a big build up then sadly end up being a bit of a damp squib.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 01:57:06 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???

What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see

I'm absolutely fine, mate.  How are you keeping?

Many thanks for the suggestion.
I'm good mate thanks

Hope to see you back on here posting and debating again soon

This board is open for anyone to post and join and anyone who doesn't it's their own choice. Anything else is a bit ridiculous really
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 01:54:52 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???

What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see

I'm absolutely fine, mate.  How are you keeping?

Many thanks for the suggestion.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 01:46:58 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???

What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Is everything ok? A suggestion would be to start posting again and end this absolute cringe that seems to be going on just now. This is classic AJ and unfortunately you are getting mixed up in it. Sad to see
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Cooheid on December 02, 2020, 01:21:45 pm
Has he made the announcement yet? It’s just been word salad so far.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 01:15:43 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???

What am I meant to have done to make you think you have meant to have done something?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: mrs timbo on December 02, 2020, 01:07:22 pm
Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.

Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.

Pretty simple

Well said mr coyne.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 02, 2020, 12:39:14 pm
Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.

Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.

Pretty simple

Thankyou for the kind advice Coyne.  If I'm needing help on my posting style then I'll be sure to come to you for help.

I've been considering your 'phukin magic' and 'OMHS' catchphrases followed by 10 emojis for quite some time, but I don't think I could do them justice at this stage.

No problem son
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 12:34:35 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
What am I have meant to have done here?  ???
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 12:25:57 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.
It’s a moral issue I’m afraid.

Simply confirm that I did not, as you claimed, say that I could see posts and I will answer your questions.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 12:15:42 pm
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎

My alleged refusal is no barrier for you answering.

I'm happy to leave it at that though.  You implied you have access to posts on the EBC, so I'll let you view the ongoing assessment.

If you were lying and therefore hoodwinking Timsley, then just let me know and I'll let you know the outcome.

Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 12:11:08 pm
Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.

Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.

Pretty simple

Thankyou for the kind advice Coyne.  If I'm needing help on my posting style then I'll be sure to come to you.

I've been considering your 'phukin magic' and 'OMHS' catchphrases followed by 10 emojis for quite some time, but I don't think I could do them justice at this stage.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 11:43:20 am
Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.

Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.

Pretty simple
Agreed

All this nonsense is just a waste of time.

Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 02, 2020, 11:41:54 am
Hardline needs to change the record, it’s extremely boring.

Either come back and post normally, or don’t bother.

Pretty simple
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 11:31:13 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
I’m afraid I can’t tell you if I can view the assessment due to your refusal on 4 attempts to answer my question. 😎
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 11:25:24 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 11:24:26 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.

I will answer your question immediately when you answer mine.

Did I say I could view posts?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 11:23:06 am
This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people  ;D

Yes, one who won’t even fight his own corner with a free and open platform to do so.

Sad to see how the other 3 have been manipulated and used by him. His victim rhetoric can be compelling at first though, until you’ve seen it play out several times so I really don’t blame them.

And the demand for ethics from others who’s standards he will never reach and has no intention of reaching. It is remarkable and fascinating to observe.

I would note at this point I am banned from his board for nothing at all that I have posted on his board, while he lectures others! 🥴🥴🥴
You should demand an apology for him banning you  :)

In all honesty I hope you won't even be considering any form of apology. He will miss a busy board the most out of anyone and it his choice he isn't posting on here.

I plan on reminding him often about his hilarious behaviour the last couple weeks if I ever share a board with him again  ;D

I am definitely not considering any kind of apology. 😀

I am happy to concede points in discussion where appropriate were a discussion to take place. I would of course have my own arguments to advance.

Sadly he it too scared to face me in open debate on any of these matters and instead reduced those who he has duped to flying monkeys.

(https://i.ibb.co/0tkyM9v/4-E7-D3-FF8-120-B-46-BB-8756-5-AE8-DA4-AEBCF.jpg) (https://imgbb.com/)

Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on December 02, 2020, 11:17:34 am
Any tips on what kind of things I should include in the message to be given the right to vote? What's the angle?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 11:15:13 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 11:12:52 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Just to clear up this main point at 3rd attempt: I didn’t say I could see posts, did I?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 11:10:37 am
This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people  ;D

Yes, one who won’t even fight his own corner with a free and open platform to do so.

Sad to see how the other 3 have been manipulated and used by him. His victim rhetoric can be compelling at first though, until you’ve seen it play out several times so I really don’t blame them.

And the demand for ethics from others who’s standards he will never reach and has no intention of reaching. It is remarkable and fascinating to observe.

I would note at this point I am banned from his board for nothing at all that I have posted on his board, while he lectures others! 🥴🥴🥴
You should demand an apology for him banning you  :)

In all honesty I hope you won't even be considering any form of apology. He will miss a busy board the most out of anyone and it his choice he isn't posting on here.

I plan on reminding him often about his hilarious behaviour the last couple weeks if I ever share a board with him again  ;D
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 10:57:46 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?

You certainly implied that you have access to posts, and Timsley thought you did although he's been known to make an assumption now and again.

Are you able to view the assessment?  If not then I'll be happy to keep you informed.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:53:16 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
I’ve looked at the post you referred me to.

I didn’t say I could view posts. Did I?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:52:08 am
This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people  ;D

Yes, one who won’t even fight his own corner with a free and open platform to do so.

Sad to see how the other 3 have been manipulated and used by him. His victim rhetoric can be compelling at first though, until you’ve seen it play out several times so I really don’t blame them.

And the demand for ethics from others who’s standards he will never reach and has no intention of reaching. It is remarkable and fascinating to observe.

I would note at this point I am banned from his board for nothing at all that I have posted on his board, while he lectures others! 🥴🥴🥴
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 10:48:01 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?

I kindly refer you to post #65 on the Rightyleaks thread.

I can't predict what the panel will say mate.  You may be told to fix or apologise for your own democracy denying first.  I'm sure you'd have no problems with doing this on a moral level, and it would allow you to save face somewhat too, claiming you were forced into it but without directly giving in to AJ.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 10:46:49 am
This is all on the back of a 50 odd year old man going in the huff on the internet and refusing to return unless he gets a public apology

Please let that sink in people  ;D
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 10:44:27 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!
FFS  :)
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 10:30:27 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!

Oh dear; caveats on ethics and democracy. Tut tut tut tut tut. 😯

I didn’t say I was able to view posts. Did I?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 10:20:57 am
Good morning Pete.

Many thanks for your request to be allowed to vote in the WBOTY award 2020.

Your request is currently being assessed by the panel on the Ethical Board Continuing.

You were saying before that you're able to view posts, so you'll be able to see how the assessment goes and whether your vote is counted or not.

To answer your point, we go by democracy, but it may be felt by the panel that we should only grant democracy to those who do the same.  Anyway, you'll be able to see how discussions go.

Thanks for expressing an interest!
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 09:35:43 am
If any of you guys want a vote then feel free to PM me and your application will be assessed by the panel.
You need to apply to vote and you all decide if the vote should be counted? How very ethical  ;D
I wonder if Hardliner would flagrantly go against democracy. Would be interesting to find out.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 09:34:25 am
If any of you guys want a vote then feel free to PM me and your application will be assessed by the panel.
You need to apply to vote and you all decide if the vote should be counted? How very ethical  ;D
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 09:30:25 am
Actually I might use my democratic right to vote
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Fremsley on December 02, 2020, 09:25:39 am
I'll only be voting on the boards I actually use mr panty so I will politely decline.
Same here, Mr Rambo
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: mrs timbo on December 02, 2020, 09:18:47 am
I'll only be voting on the boards I actually use mr panty so I will politely decline.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on December 02, 2020, 09:13:48 am
If any of you guys want a vote then feel free to PM me and your application will be assessed by the panel.
Will the process be ethical and democratic, Brother Hardliner?
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: guest19 on December 02, 2020, 07:02:42 am
If any of you guys want a vote then feel free to PM me and your application will be assessed by the panel.
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Sir Brenty on December 01, 2020, 09:54:16 pm
Hardliner
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Erchie Baird's Bar on December 01, 2020, 09:37:18 pm
I nominate Laurence Fox
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: Buc on December 01, 2020, 08:22:30 am
JTC .
Title: Re: AN ANNOUNCEMENT
Post by: PeterGrant on November 30, 2020, 09:49:07 pm
I’d like to suggest JTC. Lovely guy but seems awfully fearful for some reason and also paranoid that his being English is some kind of problem.

Also becomes upset at a gif of Jack Nicholson making a faux wanking gesture.
Title: WET BLANKET OF THE YEAR AWARD
Post by: guest19 on November 30, 2020, 09:14:18 pm
Tomorrow, the polls open for the famous Wet Blanket Of The Year Award.

The events of The Disruption of 21st November and the subsequent lack of apology have lead us to unenviable position where POTY and ROTY voting will take place in an echo chamber without the drama they could have otherwise produced.  It's highly likely that those topping the ROTY poll won't even be posting at the time, taking the sting out of the event.

For that reason, the Mighty Righties have decided to hold our very own WBOTY poll.  This will take place throughout the month of December, with the winner being announced on Hogmanay, probably around lunchtime.  This will allow everybody to know the result well in advance of the bells and be able to toast the 'winner'.  Everyone taking part will be given 2 votes and these votes can be changed as many times as one wants.

If anybody would like to join in the fun, then feel free to send me a PM and our panel will assess your application.

Polling will take place on The Ethical Board (Continuing).

(https://i.imgflip.com/225zfm.jpg)