270450-E9-5258-4-C56-9021-54853030-EE24




Author Topic: The £1.4 billion  (Read 531 times)

guest3

  • Guest
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #30 on: December 09, 2020, 12:05:55 pm »
Built with cheap Chinese steel. Absolutely disgraceful.
Is the snp the most incompetent party ever ?

That statement says you know nothing about tenders Deemo .

There wasn't a steel company in the UK big enough to handle that contract someone shut them all down .
There was some Scottish steel used to build that bridge.
As regarding tenders the engineer's decide what steel NEEDS to be used for that structure not the Scottish government do you not know that .
 no where in the UK had that type of steel the engineer's required for the job .

There are different types of steel that are suitable for different jobs.

You spoke / moaned about this year's ago . I thought your post was replied to in full especially about the Chinese steel.

Not one company from the uk tendered for it you do know that right.?
Tendered for what specifically?

guest16

  • Guest
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #31 on: December 09, 2020, 12:07:11 pm »
The First Minister replied: “I would certainly be glad to arrange a ministerial meeting. I point out that 118 subcontracts have been awarded to Scottish firms from the total of 155 subcontracts that have been awarded to date. That represents 76 per cent of total subcontracts. We can also consider that 870 of the 1041 supply orders that have been awarded for the principal contract have gone to Scottish companies.

A spokesman for Tata said: “Tata Steel can confirm that they did participate indirectly in the tendering process for the Forth Bridge contract and that their Dalzell works is capable of supplying a significant proportion of the steel required.”

Participated indecently means didn’t bid.
Next!!!! 😆
No excuses, it is a disgrace that steel had to come all the way from China. And now we are paying the price for using cheap crappy steel.
Is the hospital open yet ? Failure after failure is the snp

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2021
  • Karma: +4/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #32 on: December 09, 2020, 12:10:54 pm »
Built with cheap Chinese steel. Absolutely disgraceful.
Is the snp the most incompetent party ever ?

That statement says you know nothing about tenders Deemo .

There wasn't a steel company in the UK big enough to handle that contract someone shut them all down .
There was some Scottish steel used to build that bridge.
As regarding tenders the engineer's decide what steel NEEDS to be used for that structure not the Scottish government do you not know that .
 no where in the UK had that type of steel the engineer's required for the job .

There are different types of steel that are suitable for different jobs.

You spoke / moaned about this year's ago . I thought your post was replied to in full especially about the Chinese steel.

Not one company from the uk tendered for it you do know that right.?
Okay then.
https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/news/local-news/dalzell-steelworks-16billion-forth-road-2556564


Did they tender for that contract never saw anything saying they did .

Did you miss what Queen Nicola said in her reply that 118 subcontracts have been "awarded" to Scottish firms out of 155 that represents 76% of the total .
Also that 870 of the 1041 supply orders have been awarded for the principal contract have gone to "Scottish companies".

Thanks for sharing that link .

Offline

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2021
  • Karma: +4/-2
    • View Profile
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #33 on: December 09, 2020, 12:14:35 pm »
The First Minister replied: “I would certainly be glad to arrange a ministerial meeting. I point out that 118 subcontracts have been awarded to Scottish firms from the total of 155 subcontracts that have been awarded to date. That represents 76 per cent of total subcontracts. We can also consider that 870 of the 1041 supply orders that have been awarded for the principal contract have gone to Scottish companies.

A spokesman for Tata said: “Tata Steel can confirm that they did participate indirectly in the tendering process for the Forth Bridge contract and that their Dalzell works is capable of supplying a significant proportion of the steel required.”

Participated indecently means didn’t bid.
Next!!!! 😆
No excuses, it is a disgrace that steel had to come all the way from China. And now we are paying the price for using cheap crappy steel.
Is the hospital open yet ? Failure after failure is the snp

As yet I've not seen the SNP with boiler suits and safety hats on building it .

I'm not sure if you know that the contractors give a price for the work set within a time frame .

If the contractor passes that time limit they could be well fined for being late .
Without a good excuse of course which they need to prove.

guest16

  • Guest
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #34 on: December 09, 2020, 12:15:34 pm »
Dalzell were snubbed. A disgrace
Is the bridge open ? The hospital ?

And how can you call that thing a queen ?
She is not even a thing.

guest16

  • Guest
Re: The £1.4 billion
« Reply #35 on: December 09, 2020, 12:16:52 pm »
The First Minister replied: “I would certainly be glad to arrange a ministerial meeting. I point out that 118 subcontracts have been awarded to Scottish firms from the total of 155 subcontracts that have been awarded to date. That represents 76 per cent of total subcontracts. We can also consider that 870 of the 1041 supply orders that have been awarded for the principal contract have gone to Scottish companies.

A spokesman for Tata said: “Tata Steel can confirm that they did participate indirectly in the tendering process for the Forth Bridge contract and that their Dalzell works is capable of supplying a significant proportion of the steel required.”

Participated indecently means didn’t bid.
Next!!!! 😆
No excuses, it is a disgrace that steel had to come all the way from China. And now we are paying the price for using cheap crappy steel.
Is the hospital open yet ? Failure after failure is the snp

As yet I've not seen the SNP with boiler suits and safety hats on building it .

I'm not sure if you know that the contractors give a price for the work set within a time frame .

If the contractor passes that time limit they could be well fined for being late .
Without a good excuse of course which they need to prove.
Pity, theý might fall off it